CaliforniaTempleton

Vineyard Hills Health Center

290 Heather Court, Templeton, CA 93465 · San Luis Obispo County · 99 certified beds · avg 92 residents/day · certified since Apr 28, 1986

Part of chain: COMPASS HEALTH, INC. (7 facilities, chain avg rating 5.0★)

5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.34
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (16)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 27, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Jun 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jun 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have enough support staff to safely and effectively run its food and nutrition service.
Jun 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Jun 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention.
Jun 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Jun 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Jun 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Jun 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Jun 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Dec 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint
Jun 10, 2021F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 10, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Jun 10, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202130F
202310D
202460E
202560E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityCalifornia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.344.313.95top 10% in California; top 9% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.320.610.69bottom 15% in California; bottom 12% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.553.903.50top 13% in California; top 11% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.160.510.48bottom 3% in California; bottom 6% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)48.136.745.8bottom 18% in California; bottom 42% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)20.038.142.9top 19% in California; top 13% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.89, RN 0.29, weekend 4.17. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Coastal LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/01/1996
Compass Health INCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/01/1996
Compass Holdings INCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2008
Gerrish, NancyIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/25/2021
Gerrish, WilliamIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/25/2021
Hamilton, AmyIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/25/2021
Hodge, TimothyIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2004
Mark and Patricia Woolpert Living TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest47%08/25/2021
McMullen, JuanitaIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/25/2021
Moya, MarieIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/22/2010
Smith, DarrenIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/26/2008
Woolpert, MarcyIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/25/2021
Woolpert, MarkIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/25/2021
Woolpert, PatriciaIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/25/2021
Alexander, LaceyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/09/2008
Alexander, LaceyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/09/2008
Carder, HaroldIndividualGeneral Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/25/2021
Carder, HaroldIndividualLimited Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/25/2021
Coastal LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/1996
Coastal LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/1996

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Coastal Oaks Special Care Center8.1 miAtascadero, CA★★★★★5/5
Bayside Care Center14.2 miMorro Bay, CA★★★★★5/5
San Luis Transitional Care19.7 miSan Luis Obispo, CA★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Templeton →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555220.