Vineyard Care Center

Name: Vineyard Care Center
Address: 1090 EAST DINUBA AVENUE, Reedley, CA, 93654, US
Telephone: 5596383577

1090 East Dinuba Avenue, Reedley, CA 93654 · Fresno County · 56 certified beds · avg 52 residents/day · certified since Jun 1, 1973

Part of chain: JERICHO CARE GROUP (7 facilities, chain avg rating 2.3★)

3/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

3.81

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, repeated · Jul 19, 2021 · F-0692

The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.

Why it matters: Malnutrition and dehydration can quickly weaken a resident and lead to serious complications.

Severity (H): Multiple residents were actually harmed by the same failure — a pattern of real harm, not an isolated incident.

Corrected: Aug 18, 2021 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (40)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Apr 1, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Apr 1, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Feb 24, 2025	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Feb 24, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 24, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have enough support staff to safely and effectively run its food and nutrition service.
Feb 24, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Feb 24, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 24, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Feb 24, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 24, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Feb 24, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not properly plan a resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs after leaving.
Feb 24, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Feb 24, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Feb 24, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems.
Feb 24, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 26, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Nov 26, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · from a complaint
Dec 15, 2023	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Dec 15, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Dec 15, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Dec 15, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required.
Dec 15, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 15, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Dec 15, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Dec 15, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Dec 15, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 19, 2021	▲ H · Actual harm, repeated	The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Jul 19, 2021	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service.
Jul 19, 2021	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 19, 2021	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Jul 19, 2021	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Jul 19, 2021	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Jul 19, 2021	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jul 19, 2021	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jul 19, 2021	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jul 19, 2021	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Jul 19, 2021	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems.
Jul 19, 2021	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows.
Jul 19, 2021	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 19, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 13).

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2021	14	1	H ▲
2023	9	0	F
2024	2	0	E
2025	13	0	F
2026	2	0	D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	California avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.81	4.31	3.95	bottom 27% in California; top 48% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.35	0.61	0.69	bottom 20% in California; bottom 15% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	3.42	3.90	3.50	bottom 24% in California; top 46% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.27	0.51	0.48	bottom 26% in California; bottom 26% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	35.7	36.7	45.8	top 49% in California; top 26% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	50.0	38.1	42.9	bottom 29% in California; bottom 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.85, RN 0.35, weekend 3.46. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Bayshire Central Valley LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	100%	12/01/2022
Dewalt, Crystal	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	03/25/2024
Dewalt, Crystal	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/25/2024
Grossman, Stephen	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2023
Grossman, Stephen	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2023
Parrott, Jason	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	01/30/2023
Parrott, Jason	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/30/2023
Sheehan, Stacy	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	05/01/2024
Sheehan, Stacy	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	05/01/2024
Villegas, Roxanna	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2024
Villegas, Roxanna	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"How do you monitor residents' weight and eating, and what happens when someone starts losing weight?"
"If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
"Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
"Can we tour the whole building today, including resident bathrooms and common areas, not just the lobby?"
"Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
"How is your kitchen staffed, and have meals ever been delayed because of staffing?"
"Who reviews your menus, and can I see this week's menu and join my family member for a meal?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection
Sierra View Homes	0.5 mi	Reedley, CA	★★☆☆☆	3/5
Palm Village Retirement Comm.	0.8 mi	Reedley, CA	★★★☆☆	2/5
Dinuba Healthcare	4.9 mi	Dinuba, CA	★★★★☆	4/5
Kingsburg Center	8.0 mi	Kingsburg, CA	★★★☆☆	3/5
Bethel Lutheran Home	9.0 mi	Selma, CA	★★★☆☆	3/5
Rolling Hills Care Center	9.5 mi	Selma, CA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Cornerstone Care Center	10.7 mi	Sanger, CA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Fowler Care Center	11.5 mi	Fowler, CA	★★★☆☆	2/5
Vineyards at Fowler	13.0 mi	Fowler, CA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
California Home for the Aged	16.3 mi	Fresno, CA	★★★★★	5/5
Grace Healthcare Center	17.1 mi	Fresno, CA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Manning Gardens Care Center, INC	17.2 mi	Fresno, CA	★★★★★	4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Reedley →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 055799.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Vineyard Care Center

1090 East Dinuba Avenue, Reedley, CA 93654 · 5596383577

Health inspection rating 3/5 · CMS overall 4/5· Fines (3y): $0

Most serious findings on record:

▲ Jul 19, 2021 (F-0692, Actual harm, repeated): The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "How do you monitor residents' weight and eating, and what happens when someone starts losing weight?"
☐ "If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
☐ "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
☐ "Can we tour the whole building today, including resident bathrooms and common areas, not just the lobby?"
☐ "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
☐ "How is your kitchen staffed, and have meals ever been delayed because of staffing?"
☐ "Who reviews your menus, and can I see this week's menu and join my family member for a meal?"
☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 055799 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)