Caroline Kline Galland Home

Name: Caroline Kline Galland Home
Address: 7500 SEWARD PARK AVENUE SOUTH, Seattle, WA, 98118, US
Telephone: 2067258800

7500 Seward Park Avenue South, Seattle, WA 98118 · King County · 205 certified beds · avg 193 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1992

2/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

4.84

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (35)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
May 28, 2026	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. · from a complaint
Mar 4, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council.
Mar 4, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Mar 4, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Mar 4, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Mar 4, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Mar 4, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Mar 4, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Mar 4, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 4, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Mar 4, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Mar 4, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Mar 4, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Mar 4, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Mar 4, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Mar 4, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the social services residents need — such as counseling, help with adjustment, or connecting to outside resources — to achieve the best possible quality of life.
Mar 4, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Mar 4, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 4, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Nov 21, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Nov 21, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Nov 21, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Nov 21, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 21, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Nov 21, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Nov 21, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Nov 21, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Nov 21, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Nov 21, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Nov 21, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Nov 21, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Nov 21, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Aug 4, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Aug 4, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Aug 4, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (13 → 18).

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2023	3	E
2024	13	E
2026	19	F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Washington avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	4.84	4.24	3.95	top 12% in Washington; top 16% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	1.01	0.91	0.69	top 28% in Washington; top 15% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	4.26	3.69	3.50	top 11% in Washington; top 16% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	1.04	0.67	0.48	top 9% in Washington; top 5% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	0.0	45.1	45.8	—
RN turnover (%)	0.0	45.4	42.9	—

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 6.21, RN 1.30, weekend 5.47. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Alhadeff, Jeanie	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	02/18/2008
Allmo, Jack	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	02/18/2008
An, Christine	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2010
An, Christine	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/1992
An, Christine	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/1992
Babadzhanova, Liliya	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	11/22/2016
Babadzhanova, Liliya	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	11/22/2016
Benoliel, David	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	02/18/2008
Berg, Sonja	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	05/01/2025
Berg, Sonja	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	05/01/2025
Berg, Sonja	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	05/01/2025
Bridge, Marc	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2019
Cohen, Jeffrey	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2006
Cohen, Jeffrey	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2006
Cohen, Jeffrey	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2006
Cohen, Michael	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	02/18/2008
Consolidated Billing Services INC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2007
Consolidated Billing Services INC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	04/07/2025
Diament, Trea	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2025
Dubey, Lynn	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	09/17/2012

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"How do your actual daily staffing levels compare to what's reported on Medicare's Care Compare website?"
"Does your facility have an active resident council, and how does management respond to its concerns?"
"Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
"Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
"Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
"Can I see this month's activities calendar, and what do you offer residents who can't leave their rooms?"
"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"Who reviews your menus, and can I see this week's menu and join my family member for a meal?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Kin on Health Care Center	1.3 mi	Seattle, WA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Washington Care Center	2.9 mi	Seattle, WA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Covenant Shores Health Center	4.2 mi	Mercer Island, WA	★★★★★	4/5
Renton Health & Rehabilitation	4.3 mi	Renton, WA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Transitional Care of Seattle	4.4 mi	Seattle, WA	★★★★☆	3/5
Avamere Rehabilitation of Burien	5.0 mi	Burien, WA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Seattle Medical Post Acute Care	5.3 mi	Seattle, WA	★★☆☆☆	1/5	abuse
Providence Mount St Vincent	5.4 mi	Seattle, WA	★★★☆☆	2/5
The Terraces at Skyline	5.7 mi	Seattle, WA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Bailey-Boushay House	6.2 mi	Seattle, WA	★★★☆☆	3/5
Mirabella	6.4 mi	Seattle, WA	★★★★★	3/5
Avamere Rehabilitation at Park West	6.7 mi	Seattle, WA	★★☆☆☆	2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Seattle →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 505442.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Caroline Kline Galland Home

7500 Seward Park Avenue South, Seattle, WA 98118 · 2067258800

Health inspection rating 2/5 · CMS overall 3/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "How do your actual daily staffing levels compare to what's reported on Medicare's Care Compare website?"
☐ "Does your facility have an active resident council, and how does management respond to its concerns?"
☐ "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
☐ "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
☐ "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
☐ "Can I see this month's activities calendar, and what do you offer residents who can't leave their rooms?"
☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "Who reviews your menus, and can I see this week's menu and join my family member for a meal?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 505442 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)