The Villa at Traverse Point
2828 Concord Street, Traverse City, MI 49684 · Grand Traverse County · 96 certified beds · avg 81 residents/day · certified since Aug 25, 1981
Part of chain: VILLA HEALTHCARE (18 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
All citations in the current public record (15)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · from a complaint |
| May 8, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows. |
| May 8, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. |
| Jun 11, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. |
| Jun 11, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Dec 5, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint |
| Aug 24, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. |
| Aug 24, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Aug 24, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint |
| Aug 24, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint |
| Aug 24, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Aug 24, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have a policy covering how food brought in by family and visitors is used and stored safely. |
| Aug 24, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. |
| Aug 24, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| Aug 24, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (2 → 2).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 10 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 2 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 2 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Michigan avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.40 | 4.32 | 3.95 | top 34% in Michigan; top 26% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.93 | 0.84 | 0.69 | top 30% in Michigan; top 19% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.50 | 3.79 | 3.50 | bottom 43% in Michigan; top 42% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.58 | 0.49 | 0.48 | top 28% in Michigan; top 25% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 61.9 | 44.1 | 45.8 | bottom 9% in Michigan; bottom 14% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 50.0 | 39.2 | 42.9 | bottom 32% in Michigan; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.67, RN 0.78, weekend 2.93. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omnia Opco Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 07/01/2023 |
| Aaron, Jonathan | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Aaron, Jonathan | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Aaron, Jonathan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Baumol, Yehoshua | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Berger, Menachem | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/15/2025 |
| Graf, Marcella | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Israel, Benjamin | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/07/2025 |
| Kroll, Gabriel | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/15/2025 |
| Link, Eric | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/03/2022 |
| Link, Eric | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/03/2022 |
| Nagel, Steven | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/15/2025 |
| Singerman, Joseph | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Singerman, Joseph | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Stern, Todd | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/07/2025 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you explain health changes and treatment options to residents and their families?"
- "Who oversees residents' therapeutic diets, and how do the doctor and dietitian work together on them?"
- "Could I join residents for a meal to see the food quality and temperature for myself?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "What specific steps do you take to prevent abuse and neglect, and how are staff trained on them?"
- "Do you have a qualified dietician on staff, and how involved are they in each resident's nutrition plan?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medilodge of GTC | 1.3 mi | Traverse City, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Medilodge of Traverse City | 1.5 mi | Traverse City, MI | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Grand Traverse Pavilions | 1.8 mi | Traverse City, MI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Orchard Creek Skilled Nursing | 4.7 mi | Traverse City, MI | ★★★★☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Maple Valley Nursing Home | 14.6 mi | Maple Valley, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Medilodge of Leelanau | 16.4 mi | Suttons Bay, MI | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
All facilities in Traverse City →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235412.