The Lodge at Tangi Pines

Name: The Lodge at Tangi Pines
Address: 10746 Hwy 16, Amite, LA, 70422, US
Telephone: 9857489464

10746 Hwy 16, Amite, LA 70422 · Tangipahoa County · 100 certified beds · avg 96 residents/day · certified since Oct 1, 1995

3/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

$127,180

Fines, last 3 years

4.59

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, repeated · Apr 30, 2025 · F-0602 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds.

Why it matters: Residents can lose money, jewelry, or cherished possessions to theft or misuse.

Severity (H): Multiple residents were actually harmed by the same failure — a pattern of real harm, not an isolated incident.

Corrected: Apr 9, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Actual harm, repeated · Mar 20, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (H): Multiple residents were actually harmed by the same failure — a pattern of real harm, not an isolated incident.

Corrected: Apr 18, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (19)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Apr 15, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Apr 15, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 15, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 15, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Dec 19, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Dec 19, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Apr 30, 2025	▲ H · Actual harm, repeated	The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Apr 30, 2025	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 30, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Apr 30, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Apr 30, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Apr 30, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 22, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
May 22, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 22, 2024	C · Minimal risk, facility-wide	The facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman.
Mar 20, 2024	▲ H · Actual harm, repeated	The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Mar 20, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Mar 20, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Mar 20, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 4).

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2024	7	1	H ▲
2025	8	1	H ▲
2026	4	0	E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $127,180.

Date	Type	Amount / length
Apr 30, 2025	Fine	$11,350
Mar 20, 2024	Fine	$115,830

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Louisiana avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	4.59	4.04	3.95	top 20% in Louisiana; top 21% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.28	0.32	0.69	top 46% in Louisiana; bottom 8% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	4.05	3.45	3.50	top 14% in Louisiana; top 21% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.11	0.20	0.48	bottom 24% in Louisiana; bottom 2% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	49.6	47.6	45.8	bottom 41% in Louisiana; bottom 38% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	16.7	41.6	42.9	top 15% in Louisiana; top 9% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.08, RN 0.25, weekend 3.60. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Capital Hill Holdings	Organization	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2018
Champion Management LLC	Organization	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2016
Hill, Kaley	Individual	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2016
Hometown Healthcare Management	Organization	Direct Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2016
Stagg, John	Individual	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2016
Babin, Bond	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	03/29/2018
Babin, Bond	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/29/2018
Genovese, Charles	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	05/01/2016
Genovese, Charles	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2016
Hill, Kaley	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2016
Hill, Kaley	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	08/01/2021
Stagg, John	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2016
Stagg, John	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	08/01/2021

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"What safeguards do you have to protect residents' money and belongings, and what happens when something goes missing?"
"Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
"How does your quality committee work, and can you give an example of a problem it recently identified and fixed?"
"Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
"When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
St. Helena Parish Nursing Home	10.2 mi	Greensburg, LA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuse
Heritage Healthcare of Hammond	16.9 mi	Hammond, LA	★☆☆☆☆	2/5
Hammond Nursing Home	16.9 mi	Hammond, LA	★★★★☆	4/5
Landmark Nursing Center Hammond	18.2 mi	Hammond, LA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Belle Maison Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, LLC	18.6 mi	Hammond, LA	★★★☆☆	4/5
Ponchatoula Community Care Center	19.6 mi	Ponchatoula, LA	★★★★★	5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Amite →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 195349.

The Care File

Visit checklist — The Lodge at Tangi Pines

10746 Hwy 16, Amite, LA 70422 · 9857489464

Health inspection rating 3/5 · CMS overall 3/5· Fines (3y): $127,180

Most serious findings on record:

▲ Apr 30, 2025 (F-0602, Actual harm, repeated): The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds.
▲ Mar 20, 2024 (F-0600, Actual harm, repeated): The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "What safeguards do you have to protect residents' money and belongings, and what happens when something goes missing?"
☐ "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
☐ "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
☐ "How does your quality committee work, and can you give an example of a problem it recently identified and fixed?"
☐ "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
☐ "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 195349 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)