ArkansasConway

The Blossoms at Conway Rehab & Nursing Center

3501 College Avenue, Conway, AR 72034 · Faulkner County · 104 certified beds · avg 73 residents/day · certified since Jun 22, 1996

Part of chain: THE BLOSSOMS REHAB & NURSING CENTER (23 facilities, chain avg rating 2.6★)

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$8,021
Fines, last 3 years
3.75
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Aug 22, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Oct 10, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (36)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 21, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 21, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
May 21, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
May 21, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve meals and snacks at times that fit residents' needs, preferences, and requests, or did not offer nourishing alternatives for residents who want to eat outside scheduled meal times.
May 21, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Aug 22, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Aug 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Jul 3, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint
Mar 7, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Mar 7, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Mar 7, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Mar 7, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Mar 7, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint
Mar 7, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Mar 7, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Mar 7, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Mar 7, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Mar 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Mar 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Mar 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Mar 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Oct 11, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Dec 9, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Dec 9, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Dec 9, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Dec 9, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Dec 9, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Dec 9, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Dec 9, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems.
Dec 9, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 9, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not properly inform residents or their representatives about arbitration agreements — contracts that give up the right to sue in court — including their right to refuse to sign.
Dec 9, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a neutral and fair arbitration process. Arbitration is a way of settling disputes outside of court, and if it's used, the facility must agree with the resident on a neutral arbitrator and a convenient location.
Dec 9, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Dec 9, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Dec 9, 2022B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (13 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2022130E
202310E
2024161J ▲
202560F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $8,021.

DateTypeAmount / length
Aug 22, 2024Fine$8,021

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityArkansas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.754.713.95bottom 6% in Arkansas; bottom 49% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.380.480.69bottom 30% in Arkansas; bottom 19% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.364.043.50bottom 10% in Arkansas; top 50% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.340.280.48top 30% in Arkansas; bottom 41% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)71.349.545.8bottom 5% in Arkansas; bottom 5% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)72.744.842.9bottom 12% in Arkansas; bottom 9% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.30, RN 0.33, weekend 2.96. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Aks Ar Opco LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest04/05/2023
Diamond Opco Holding LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%04/01/2023
Herzka, MatisyohuIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest04/05/2023
MH Ar Opco LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest04/05/2023
Schreiber, AbrahamIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest04/05/2023
Hansen Hunter LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/15/2021
LTC Consulting Services LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/05/2023
LTC Consulting Services LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/05/2023
Luster, StacyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
Oasis Health Care Group, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/05/2023
Oasis Health Care Group, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/05/2023
Rainosek, DavidIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/05/2023
Reliant Pro Rehab LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/05/2023
Romero, TammyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/05/2025
Romero, TammyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/05/2025
Roudachevski, EvgueniIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/05/2021
Sadiq, BilalIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/05/2023
Scheinbaum, ShlomoIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
Scheinbaum, ShlomoIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
Scheinbaum, ShlomoIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Heritage Living Center1.3 miConway, AR★★★★☆3/5
Conway Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center1.7 miConway, AR★★★☆☆2/5
Salem Place Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, INC1.8 miConway, AR★★★★★4/5
Superior Health & Rehab, LLC4.2 miConway, AR★★★★★5/5
Greenbrier Nursing and Rehabilitation Center11.1 miGreenbrier, AR★★★★★5/5
Brookridge Cove Rehabilitation and Care Center15.0 miMorrilton, AR★★★★☆3/5
The Lakes at Maumelle Health and Rehabilitation15.5 miMaumelle, AR★★★☆☆3/5
The Springs of Pinnacle Mountain18.8 miLittle Rock, AR★★★★☆4/5
Perry County Nursing and Rehabilitation Center19.1 miPerryville, AR★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Conway →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 045313.