South DakotaBristol

Sun Dial Manor

410 Second Street, Bristol, SD 57219 · Day County · 37 certified beds · avg 19 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1996

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$24,528
Fines, last 3 years
5.54
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Oct 29, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Nov 28, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Dec 21, 2023 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jan 23, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (21)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 29, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
May 21, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 21, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
May 21, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
May 21, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
May 21, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
May 21, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a policy covering how food brought in by family and visitors is used and stored safely.
May 21, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 21, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop, carry out, or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members. · from a complaint
May 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
May 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility hired someone with an official finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft against them. Facilities are not allowed to employ people with such findings.
Dec 4, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Oct 29, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Oct 29, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · from a complaint
Dec 21, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Dec 21, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Dec 21, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Dec 21, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
Dec 21, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Dec 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Dec 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 10).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202371G ▲
202431G ▲
2025100F
202610E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $24,528.

DateTypeAmount / length
Oct 29, 2024Fine$10,839
Dec 21, 2023Fine$13,689

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilitySouth Dakota avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.544.323.95top 13% in South Dakota; top 7% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.330.910.69top 9% in South Dakota; top 7% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.933.713.50top 9% in South Dakota; top 7% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.640.510.48top 24% in South Dakota; top 20% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)55.648.245.8bottom 28% in South Dakota; bottom 24% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.034.742.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.08, RN 0.98, weekend 3.63. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Sun Dial Manor INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%03/23/1968
Bury, KathrynIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2020
Caring Professionals INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/19/2019
Caring Professionals INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/07/2025
Dylla, PamIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2019
Gravley, ElizabethIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2025
Gravley, ElizabethIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2000
Johnson, AaronIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Morehouse, DiannIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2024
Olson, ElroyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2024
Sanford Health NetworkOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2000
Sanford Health NetworkOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/07/2025
Schuring, BrianIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2024
Stroschein, ChadIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/19/2019
Stroschein, ChadIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/19/2019
Sun Dial Manor INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/23/1968
Sun Dial Manor INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/24/2025
Voss, JoyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Voss, JoyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Bethesda Home10.6 miWebster, SD★★★★★4/5
Strand-Kjorsvig Community Rest Home16.3 miRoslyn, SD★★☆☆☆1/5
Avantara Groton18.6 miGroton, SD★★☆☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Bristol →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 435093.