North CarolinaAsheville

Stonecreek Health and Rehabilitation

455 Victoria Road, Asheville, NC 28801 (opens Google Maps) · Buncombe County · (828) 252-0099· 120 certified beds · avg 100 residents/day · certified since Jun 17, 1981 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: SANSTONE HEALTH & REHABILITATION (18 facilities, chain avg rating 4.2★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$38,431
Fines, last 3 years
3.01
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Apr 14, 2025 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Apr 15, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Apr 14, 2025 · F-0825

The facility did not provide or arrange specialized rehabilitation services — such as physical, occupational, or speech therapy — for residents who needed them.

Why it matters: Without needed therapy, a resident may fail to recover strength or skills they could have regained.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Apr 15, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (16)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 17, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 17, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Jun 17, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · from a complaint
Jun 17, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 14, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Apr 14, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange specialized rehabilitation services — such as physical, occupational, or speech therapy — for residents who needed them.
Apr 14, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Apr 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Dec 22, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · from a complaint
Dec 22, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · from a complaint
Dec 22, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 22, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Dec 22, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint
Dec 22, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · from a complaint
Dec 22, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide special eating equipment and utensils — like adaptive cups or easy-grip silverware — for residents who need them, along with appropriate help at meals.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202370E
202552J ▲
202640E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

1 fine totaling $38,431.

DateTypeAmount / length
Apr 14, 2025Fine$38,431

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

MeasureThis facilityNorth Carolina avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.014.013.95bottom 7% in North Carolina; bottom 14% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.470.640.69bottom 39% in North Carolina; bottom 34% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.623.563.50bottom 6% in North Carolina; bottom 13% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.480.410.48top 25% in North Carolina; top 35% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)47.649.045.8top 47% in North Carolina; bottom 43% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)41.245.742.9top 42% in North Carolina; top 49% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.30, RN 0.52, weekend 2.88. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Sprenger, ChristopherIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest02/14/2010
Ardent Health and Rehabilitation CoOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/14/2010
Asheville-Courtyard Healthcare Properties LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/14/2010
Flat Rock Healthcare Properties LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/14/2010
Franklin, HollyIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE12/02/2020
Sprenger, ChristopherIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE02/14/2010

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Elevate Health and Rehabilitation0.8 miAsheville, NC★☆☆☆☆1/5
The Laurels of Greentree Ridge1.4 miAsheville, NC★★★★★4/5
Aston Park Health Care Center2.2 miAsheville, NC★★★★★4/5
River Bend Health and Rehabilitation3.6 miAsheville, NC★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Deerfield Episcopal Retirement4.2 miAsheville, NC★★★★★5/5
The Laurels of Summit Ridge4.3 miAsheville, NC★★★★☆3/5
Givens Health Center5.0 miAsheville, NC★★★★★4/5
Bear Mountain Health and Rehabilitation5.5 miAsheville, NC★★★☆☆3/5
Emerald Ridge Health and Rehabilitation5.7 miAsheville, NC★☆☆☆☆1/5
Pisgah Manor Health Care Center6.6 miCandler, NC★★☆☆☆2/5
Swannanoa Valley Health and Rehabilitation6.7 miSwannanoa, NC★★★☆☆3/5
Biltmore Haven Nursing and Rehabilitation7.2 miArden, NC★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Asheville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 345204.