How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
202 East Mtcs Road, Murfreesboro, TN 37130 (opens Google Maps) · Rutherford County · (615) 849-8748· 68 certified beds · avg 63 residents/day · certified since May 14, 1996 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: PACS GROUP (274 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Jan 8, 2020 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Feb 24, 2020 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 16 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. F-0561
The facility did not properly notify residents about the balance of money it holds for them, or failed to return those funds when a resident was discharged, evicted, or died. F-0569
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561 |
| Dec 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly notify residents about the balance of money it holds for them, or failed to return those funds when a resident was discharged, evicted, or died. · F-0569 |
| Apr 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Aug 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint · F-0607 |
| Oct 7, 2021 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Oct 7, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Oct 7, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Oct 7, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Oct 7, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Jan 8, 2020 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jan 8, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Jan 8, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Jan 8, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jan 8, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jan 8, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 3).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 6 | 1 | J ▲ |
| 2021 | 5 | 0 | F |
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 3 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Tennessee avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.25 | 3.62 | 3.95 | top 16% in Tennessee; top 30% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.45 | 0.57 | 0.69 | bottom 37% in Tennessee; bottom 31% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.05 | 3.15 | 3.50 | top 10% in Tennessee; top 21% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.19 | 0.39 | 0.48 | bottom 10% in Tennessee; bottom 11% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 57.4 | 48.9 | 45.8 | bottom 25% in Tennessee; bottom 20% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 40.0 | 43.2 | 42.9 | top 43% in Tennessee; top 46% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.15, RN 0.55, weekend 4.91.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (5.15 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Stone River Post Acute. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hancock, Mark | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Murray, Jason | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Pacs Group, INC. | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Pacs Holdings, LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Providence Group NH, LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Branch Banking & Trust Company | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Doss, Stephanie | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Duke, Natalie | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Jergensen, Joshua | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Mitchell, John | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Providence Administrative Consulting Services INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Radley, Chiquita | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Russell, Melissa | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Russell, Melissa | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/20/2025 |
| Truist Bank | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Vollmer, Donald | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Vollmer, Donald | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Whitley, Howard | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
All 18 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Pacs Group — 274 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 273 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adamsplace, LLC | 0.5 mi | Murfreesboro, TN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Stones River Manor, INC | 1.3 mi | Murfreesboro, TN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| NHC Healthcare, Murfreesboro | 1.6 mi | Murfreesboro, TN | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Tennessee Veterans Home | 2.7 mi | Murfreesboro, TN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Community Care of Rutherford | 7.3 mi | Murfreesboro, TN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Waters of Smyrna, LLC | 10.0 mi | Smyrna, TN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Smyrna Care Center | 10.2 mi | Smyrna, TN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Life Care Center of Hickory Woods | 15.9 mi | Antioch, TN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Woodbury Health and Rehabilitation Center | 17.8 mi | Woodbury, TN | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Antioch TN Opco, LLC | 19.4 mi | Antioch, TN | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 445373.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details