MassachusettsNewton Upper Falls

Stone Rehabilitation and Senior Living

277 Elliot Street, Newton Upper Falls, MA 02464 · Middlesex County · 82 certified beds · avg 76 residents/day · certified since Dec 15, 1995

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$16,195
Fines, last 3 years
3.61
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 6, 2024 · F-0656 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.

Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Feb 27, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 6, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Feb 27, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (23)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 11, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Mar 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them.
Mar 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Apr 9, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Apr 9, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Apr 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Apr 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Apr 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Apr 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Apr 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Apr 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
May 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
May 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
May 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
May 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
May 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
May 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems.
May 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 6, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Feb 6, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202492G ▲
202590E
202650E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $16,195.

DateTypeAmount / length
Feb 6, 2024Fine$16,195

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMassachusetts avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.613.893.95bottom 39% in Massachusetts; bottom 42% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.600.650.69top 49% in Massachusetts; top 49% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.243.513.50bottom 40% in Massachusetts; bottom 44% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.440.460.48top 40% in Massachusetts; top 41% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)29.038.245.8top 23% in Massachusetts; top 13% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.042.642.9top 1% in Massachusetts; top 1% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.89, RN 0.64, weekend 3.49. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Other

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Alexander, MichaelIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2018
Alexander, MichaelIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2018
Alexander, MichaelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2018
Alley, SuzanneIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/13/2020
Alley, SuzanneIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/13/2020
Berman, AdamIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/28/2023
Berman, AdamIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/28/2023
Blake, EdwardIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/23/2023
Blake, EdwardIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/23/2023
Carreiro, SilvioIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/06/2015
Carreiro, SilvioIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/06/2015
Charles, NaissaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/15/2024
Charles, NaissaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/15/2024
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/28/2023
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/11/2025
Crescenzo, DonnaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/28/2023
Crescenzo, DonnaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/28/2023
Dubreiul, DarciIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
Lipresti, NicholasIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/24/2024
Lipresti, NicholasIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/18/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Care One at Newton1.9 miNewton, MA★★☆☆☆1/5
Skilled Nursing Facility at North Hill (the)2.1 miNeedham, MA★★☆☆☆3/5
Elizabeth Seton2.2 miWellesley, MA★★★★☆5/5
Lasell House2.4 miNewton, MA★★★★★5/5
West Newton Healthcare2.6 miWest Newton, MA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Briarwood Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center2.7 miNeedham, MA★★★★☆4/5
Care Village at Parkway3.4 miBoston, MA★★☆☆☆2/5
Newbridge on the Charles Skilled Nursing Facility3.4 miDedham, MA★★★★★5/5
Presentation Rehab and Skilled Care Center3.9 miBoston, MA★★★★☆3/5
Adviniacare Newton Wellesley4.0 miWellesley, MA★★★★☆3/5
German Center for Extended Care4.0 miBoston, MA★★★★★4/5
Maristhill Nursing & Rehabilitation Center4.3 miWaltham, MA★★★☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Newton Upper Falls →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 225683.