OklahomaStigler

Stigler Nursing & Rehab

1402 Northwest 7th Street, Stigler, OK 74462 · Haskell County · 80 certified beds · avg 54 residents/day · certified since Jan 9, 2006

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
4
Serious findings on record
$66,206
Fines, last 3 years
0.00
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Aug 1, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Aug 20, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Mar 1, 2023 · F-0678

The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.

Why it matters: In a cardiac or breathing emergency, failure to start CPR promptly can be the difference between life and death.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Apr 14, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Mar 1, 2023 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Apr 14, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 7, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Feb 12, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (23)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 12, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Aug 1, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Aug 1, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · from a complaint
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Apr 17, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Feb 7, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Feb 7, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Feb 7, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Feb 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Mar 1, 2023▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.
Mar 1, 2023▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Mar 1, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.
Mar 1, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Mar 1, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs.
Mar 1, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its staff were vaccinated for COVID-19 in accordance with the federal requirements in effect at the time.
Mar 1, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Mar 1, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Mar 1, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202392K ▲
202492J ▲
202650F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $66,206, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Aug 1, 2024Fine$20,772
Feb 7, 2024Fine$45,434
Feb 7, 2024Payment Denial12 days from Mar 13, 2024

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOklahoma avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)0.004.583.95
Registered Nurse hours0.000.410.69
Weekend total nurse staffing0.004.163.50
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.000.280.48
Total nursing staff turnover (%)60.055.545.8bottom 35% in Oklahoma; bottom 17% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.053.642.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 0.00, RN 0.00, weekend 0.00. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Montgomery, James CIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Aldrich, RyanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Aldrich, RyanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Forvis Mazars LLPOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Forvis Mazars LLPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/19/2025
Haskell County Nursing CenterOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Haskell County Nursing CenterOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2008
Hightower, RonaldIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Hightower, RonaldIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Interhealth, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Interhealth, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/11/2025
Montgomery, BradfordIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Montgomery, BradfordIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Montgomery, BradfordIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Montgomery, James CIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Montgomery, James CIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Montgomery, James CIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Stites, GregoryIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Stites, GregoryIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Whitley, TinaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Countryside Estates17.5 miWarner, OK★★★☆☆4/5
Community Health Care of Gore18.0 miGore, OK★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Vian Nursing & Rehab, LLC18.6 miVian, OK★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Stigler →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 375497.