How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
301 17th Street, Stanton, NE 68779 (opens Google Maps) · Stanton County · (402) 439-2111· 70 certified beds · avg 58 residents/day · certified since Oct 5, 1990 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · May 25, 2023 · F-0678
The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.
Why it matters: In a cardiac or breathing emergency, failure to start CPR promptly can be the difference between life and death.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 15, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · May 25, 2023 · F-0684
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 15, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 16 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
The facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience. · from a complaint F-0744
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. F-0550
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| May 27, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience. · from a complaint · F-0744 |
| Jul 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Jul 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Jul 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Jul 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Jun 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
| Jun 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | When a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care. · F-0661 |
| Jun 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jun 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Jun 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 25, 2023 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. · F-0678 |
| May 25, 2023 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| May 25, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| May 25, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| May 25, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 4).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 5 | 2 | J ▲ |
| 2024 | 5 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 4 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Nebraska avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.32 | 4.33 | 3.95 | top 49% in Nebraska; top 28% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.89 | 0.72 | 0.69 | top 27% in Nebraska; top 21% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.54 | 3.79 | 3.50 | bottom 39% in Nebraska; top 40% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.44 | 0.47 | 0.48 | top 45% in Nebraska; top 42% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 53.4 | 48.7 | 45.8 | bottom 36% in Nebraska; bottom 28% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 18.2 | 44.1 | 42.9 | top 14% in Nebraska; top 12% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.66, RN 0.76, weekend 3.00.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.66 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Stanton Health Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Church related
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| City of Stanton Nursing Home | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/31/1968 |
| Hirschman, Bryon | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2015 |
| Lammli Locke, Sonya | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/03/2022 |
| Brandow, Jonathan | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Brandow, Jonathan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Caskey, Rae | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Caskey, Rae | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| City of Stanton Nursing Home | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/31/1968 |
| Hirschman, Bryon | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2015 |
| Lammli Locke, Sonya | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/03/2022 |
| Larson, Pat | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Larson, Pat | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Moore, Kathy | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2018 |
| Moore, Kathy | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2018 |
| Paden, Colleen | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| Paden, Colleen | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| Pohlman, Amy | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Pohlman, Amy | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Voecks, Kyle | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2015 |
| Voecks, Kyle | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2015 |
All 20 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| St. Joseph's Rehabilitation and Care Center | 12.1 mi | Norfolk, NE | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Heritage of Bel Air | 12.1 mi | Norfolk, NE | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Arbor Care Centers-Countryside LLC | 13.6 mi | Madison, NE | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Clarkson Community Care Center INC | 16.0 mi | Clarkson, NE | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Wisner Care Center | 17.1 mi | Wisner, NE | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Community Pride Care Center | 19.1 mi | Battle Creek, NE | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 285102.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details