TennesseeSouth Pittsburg

Signature Healthcare of South Pittsburg Rehab & We

201 East 10th Street, South Pittsburg, TN 37380 · Marion County · 165 certified beds · avg 77 residents/day · certified since Mar 1, 1995

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

Part of chain: SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE (67 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$20,050
Fines, last 3 years
3.06
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Oct 16, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Nov 4, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Sep 21, 2023 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jun 9, 2023 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (14)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Oct 16, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Oct 16, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Oct 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Oct 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Oct 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 21, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Sep 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Sep 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have doctor's orders in place for a resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted. · from a complaint
Dec 1, 2021F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 1, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Dec 1, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them.
Mar 27, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Mar 27, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Mar 27, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not bring in qualified outside professionals to provide a required service when it didn't have a qualified professional on staff.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201930D
202130F
202331G ▲
202451G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $20,050.

DateTypeAmount / length
Oct 16, 2024Fine$12,149
Sep 21, 2023Fine$7,901

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTennessee avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.063.623.95bottom 20% in Tennessee; bottom 16% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.730.570.69top 19% in Tennessee; top 33% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.493.153.50bottom 11% in Tennessee; bottom 9% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.380.390.48top 42% in Tennessee; bottom 48% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)25.048.945.8top 3% in Tennessee; top 7% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)25.043.242.9top 18% in Tennessee; top 20% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.36, RN 0.80, weekend 2.75. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Agemo Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/01/2016
Jjla LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest11/01/2007
LP CR Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%11/01/2007
LPSNF II LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/01/2016
Steier III, ElmerIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest11/01/2007
Wheaten LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest11/01/2007
Harrison, JohnIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2007
Love, DoyleIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2021
Love, DoyleIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2021

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Cumberland Health and Rehab3.9 miBridgeport, AL★★☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Dade Health and Rehab14.0 miTrenton, GA★★★★☆4/5
Signature Healthcare of Monteagle Rehab & Wellness18.0 miMonteagle, TN★★★☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in South Pittsburg →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 445343.