MichiganMonroe

Seacrest Rehabilitation and Nursing Center

1215 N Telegraph Rd, Monroe, MI 48162 · Monroe County · 131 certified beds · avg 99 residents/day · certified since Jun 13, 1974

Part of chain: AVON HEALTHCARE (9 facilities, chain avg rating 2.2★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.81
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (15)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 12, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 12, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Feb 12, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 15, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 15, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint
Nov 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Jun 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Dec 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Dec 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Dec 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 8).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202330E
202440F
202680E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMichigan avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.814.323.95bottom 29% in Michigan; top 48% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.280.840.69bottom 3% in Michigan; bottom 7% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.433.793.50bottom 35% in Michigan; top 46% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.120.490.48bottom 2% in Michigan; bottom 2% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)26.044.145.8top 8% in Michigan; top 8% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)33.339.242.9top 38% in Michigan; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.35, RN 0.24, weekend 3.02. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Gottlieb, MosheIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest45%05/10/2022
Colman, AndrewIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2018
Colman, AndrewIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/10/2025
Freund, EliyahuIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/10/2022
Freund, EliyahuIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/10/2022
Levine, AyalaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/24/2022
Levine, AyalaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/24/2022
Monroe PropcoOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/10/2022
Worthington, KoriIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/24/2020

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Monroe Springs Skilled Nursing and Rehab0.6 miMonroe, MI★★★★☆4/5
Medilodge of Monroe0.7 miMonroe, MI★★★★★5/5
Fountain View of Monroe1.1 miMonroe, MI★★★★★5/5
Ihm Senior Living Community1.2 miMonroe, MI★★★★★5/5
Wellspring Lutheran Nursing and Rehab Services2.1 miMonroe, MI★★★★☆5/5
Majestic Care of Point Place14.8 miToledo, OH★☆☆☆☆1/5
Hickory Ridge of Temperance15.7 miTemperance, MI★★★★☆4/5
Aberdeen Rehabilitation and Skilled Nursing Center15.9 miTrenton, MI★★☆☆☆3/5
Applewood Nursing Center, INC16.3 miWoodhaven, MI★☆☆☆☆1/5
Merit House LLC18.2 miToledo, OH★★☆☆☆1/5
Aerius Health Center18.8 miRiverview, MI★★★★★5/5
Special Tree Neurocare Center19.8 miRomulus, MI★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Monroe →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235232.