TexasCleburne

Ridgeview Rehabilitation and Skilled Nursing

206 Walls Dr, Cleburne, TX 76033 · Johnson County · 134 certified beds · avg 95 residents/day · certified since Sep 11, 2008

Part of chain: DALLAS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT (5 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.92
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (20)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Dec 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Dec 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Dec 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Dec 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Aug 30, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint
May 16, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings. · from a complaint
May 16, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Sep 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · from a complaint
Sep 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Sep 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Sep 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Jul 27, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 27, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Jul 27, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jul 27, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jul 27, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Jul 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Jul 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (4 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202380F
202440D
202580E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.923.463.95top 17% in Texas; top 43% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.670.440.69top 11% in Texas; top 39% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.383.043.50top 20% in Texas; top 48% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.500.340.48top 13% in Texas; top 33% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)51.655.345.8top 49% in Texas; bottom 33% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)45.554.642.9top 39% in Texas; bottom 43% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.67, RN 0.63, weekend 3.17. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

Government - Hospital district

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Bradley, ShannanIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE12/11/2023
Bradley, ShannanIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE12/11/2023
Castaneda, EdmundoIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE01/10/2022
Castaneda, EdmundoIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/10/2022
Cerise, FrederickIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/24/2014
Dallas County Hospital DistrictOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/31/2017
J-S Cleburne Operations LPOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/31/2017
Porter, ChrisIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE02/27/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Heritage Trails Nursing and Rehabilitation Center1.9 miCleburne, TX★★★★☆4/5
Colonial Manor Nursing Center3.1 miCleburne, TX★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Town Hall Estates Keene INC7.7 miKeene, TX★★★☆☆4/5
Alvarado Meadows Nursing & Rehabilitation13.9 miAlvarado, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Advanced Rehabilitation & Healthcare of Burleson14.0 miBurleson, TX★★☆☆☆2/5
600 Maple Ave.15.4 miBurleson, TX★★★☆☆4/5
Grandview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center15.4 miGrandview, TX★★★★★4/5
Crowley Nursing and Rehabilitation17.4 miCrowley, TX★★★★★4/5
Allegiant Wellness and Rehab18.2 miCrowley, TX★★★★★5/5
Park Bend Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center18.8 miBurleson, TX★★☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Cleburne →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 676197.