301 W Criner St, Grandview, TX 76050 (opens Google Maps) · Johnson County · (817) 866-3367· 82 certified beds · avg 72 residents/day · certified since Jun 20, 1994 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, pattern · May 4, 2025 · F-0656
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.
Severity (H): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was a pattern: more than a limited occurrence, without being widespread. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 18, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, pattern · May 4, 2025 · F-0692
The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Why it matters: Malnutrition and dehydration can quickly weaken a resident and lead to serious complications.
Severity (H): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was a pattern: more than a limited occurrence, without being widespread. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: May 16, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 9 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint F-0656
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656
The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. F-0692
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| May 4, 2025 | ▲ H · Actual harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| May 4, 2025 | ▲ H · Actual harm, pattern | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| May 4, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. · F-0577 |
| May 4, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| May 4, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · F-0867 |
| May 4, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| May 4, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Feb 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 8 | 2 | H ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $21,125, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2025 | Fine | $21,125 |
| May 4, 2025 | Payment Denial | 6 days from Jun 12, 2025 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Texas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.46 | 3.46 | 3.95 | top 7% in Texas; top 24% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.19 | 0.44 | 0.69 | bottom 6% in Texas; bottom 2% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.92 | 3.04 | 3.50 | top 8% in Texas; top 25% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.21 | 0.34 | 0.48 | bottom 26% in Texas; bottom 15% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 44.3 | 55.3 | 45.8 | top 31% in Texas; top 48% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | — | 54.6 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.84, RN 0.16, weekend 3.38.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.84 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Grandview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anderson, Donna | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2022 |
| Anderson, Donna | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2022 |
| Basham, Kirby | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2021 |
| Basham, Mitchell B | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2012 |
| Basham, Mitchell B | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2012 |
| Fry, Aaron F | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2012 |
| Holloway, Julie | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2012 |
| Holloway, Julie | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2012 |
| Pickering, Clayton | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Pickering, Clayton | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/23/2025 |
| Quisenberry, David | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2012 |
| Quisenberry, David | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2012 |
All 12 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avir at Itasca | 8.1 mi | Itasca, TX | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Alvarado Meadows Nursing & Rehabilitation | 9.6 mi | Alvarado, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Town Hall Estates Keene INC | 12.1 mi | Keene, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Heritage Trails Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 14.1 mi | Cleburne, TX | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Colonial Manor Nursing Center | 14.5 mi | Cleburne, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Ridgeview Rehabilitation and Skilled Nursing | 15.4 mi | Cleburne, TX | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Renaissance Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 18.0 mi | Italy, TX | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Midlothian Healthcare Center | 18.2 mi | Midlothian, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Avir at Hillsboro | 18.3 mi | Hillsboro, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Town Hall Estates | 18.6 mi | Hillsboro, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Midtowne Meadows Health & Rehab | 18.6 mi | Midlothian, TX | ★★★★☆ | 5/5 | |
| Advanced Rehabilitation & Healthcare of Burleson | 19.5 mi | Burleson, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Johnson, TX — 9 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 675369.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details