PennsylvaniaSarver

Quality Life Services - Sarver

126 Iron Bridge Road, Sarver, PA 16055 · Butler County · 66 certified beds · avg 63 residents/day · certified since Aug 1, 1982

Part of chain: QUALITY LIFE SERVICES (10 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.54
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (36)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 23, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Nov 14, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program.
Nov 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Nov 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Nov 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Nov 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Nov 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Nov 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Nov 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Nov 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Nov 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or maintain an effective training program for its direct care staff, including training on how to communicate effectively with residents.
Mar 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Mar 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
Jan 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Nov 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint
Sep 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Sep 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Sep 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out.
Sep 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Sep 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Sep 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Sep 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Sep 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Sep 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Sep 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Sep 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Sep 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Sep 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Sep 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Aug 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Aug 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 9, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention.
Nov 9, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Nov 9, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Nov 9, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (14 → 11).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202340E
2024170D
2025140E
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityPennsylvania avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.543.943.95bottom 45% in Pennsylvania; bottom 38% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.860.800.69top 29% in Pennsylvania; top 23% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.213.583.50bottom 43% in Pennsylvania; bottom 43% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.770.560.48top 18% in Pennsylvania; top 12% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)70.644.545.8bottom 3% in Pennsylvania; bottom 5% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)81.339.942.9bottom 2% in Pennsylvania; bottom 5% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.55, RN 0.86, weekend 3.22. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Sugar Creek Rest, INCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Tack, StevenIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest33%11/01/2024
Tack-Beardsley, SusanIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest33%11/01/2024
Adams, AndrewIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Carter, ChristineIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Holsinger PCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Kania, ToniaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Lopiccolo, BonnieIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Markivich, MichaelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Mary Susan Tack-Yurek Irrevocable TrustOrganizationTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Shoop, RebeccaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Shoop, RebeccaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Stafford, LisaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Steven D Tack Irrevocable TrustOrganizationTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Susan Tack Beardsley Irrevocable TrustOrganizationTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Tack, StevenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Tack-Beardsley, SusanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Tack-Yurek, MaryIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Concordia Lutheran Health and Human Care5.2 miCabot, PA★★☆☆☆2/5
Embassy of Saxonburg6.3 miSaxonburg, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Eden Nursing & Rehabilitation Center9.5 miBrackenridge, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Snu Armstrong Co Memorial Hosp10.1 miKittanning, PA★★★☆☆3/5
Armstrong Rehabilitation and Nursing Center10.3 miKittanning, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Quality Life Services - Sugar Creek10.5 miWorthington, PA★★☆☆☆1/5
Hillcrest Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center11.4 miLower Burrell, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Kittanning Health & Rehab Center12.1 miKittanning, PA★★☆☆☆1/5
Sunnyview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center12.3 miButler, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Quality Life Services - Chicora13.7 miChicora, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing at Cheswick14.1 miCheswick, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Quality Life Services - Apollo14.2 miApollo, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Sarver →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395534.