NebraskaPlattsmouth

Prestige Care Center of Plattsmouth

602 South 18th Street, Plattsmouth, NE 68048 · Cass County · 111 certified beds · avg 84 residents/day · certified since Apr 18, 1991

Part of chain: PRESTIGE CARE CENTER (3 facilities, chain avg rating 1.0★)

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.75
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (25)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 2, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 2, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 2, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have enough fresh-air ventilation, whether through windows, mechanical systems, or both.
Apr 2, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Apr 2, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Apr 2, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide bedrooms with required basics: a window to the outside, a room at or above ground level, adequate bedding, furniture that fits the resident's needs, or enough closet space.
Apr 2, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Apr 2, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Apr 2, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids.
Apr 2, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Apr 2, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Apr 2, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Apr 2, 2026C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Feb 6, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 6, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Feb 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Feb 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Feb 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Feb 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · from a complaint
Feb 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 22, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint
Jan 22, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Jan 22, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Jan 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · from a complaint
Jan 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the social services residents need — such as counseling, help with adjustment, or connecting to outside resources — to achieve the best possible quality of life. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 13).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202450F
202570F
2026130F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

0 fines totaling $0, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jan 22, 2024Payment Denial15 days from Apr 4, 2024

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNebraska avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.754.333.95bottom 28% in Nebraska; bottom 49% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.360.720.69bottom 9% in Nebraska; bottom 16% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.663.793.50bottom 48% in Nebraska; top 35% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.160.470.48bottom 4% in Nebraska; bottom 7% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)53.148.745.8bottom 39% in Nebraska; bottom 29% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)44.444.142.9bottom 48% in Nebraska; bottom 45% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.31, RN 0.32, weekend 3.23. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Cherns, BatshevaIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest5%05/15/2023
Aschendorf, JonathanIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2023
Aschendorf, JonathanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2023
Aschendorf, JonathanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2023
Davis, SandraIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/13/2024
Davis, SandraIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/13/2024
Kaplan, YisroelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/15/2023
Wester, RebeccaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/16/2019
Wester, RebeccaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/16/2019

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Glen Haven Village9.2 miGlenwood, IA★★★☆☆2/5
Hillcrest Health & Rehab9.4 miBellevue, NE★★☆☆☆2/5
Hillcrest Country Estates-Cottages10.9 miPapillion, NE★★☆☆☆2/5
Hillcrest Shadow Lake LLC11.8 miPapillion, NE★☆☆☆☆2/5
Brookestone of Papillion12.8 miPapillion, NE★★★★★5/5
Nye Summit13.7 miLouisville, NE★★☆☆☆3/5
Tabor Manor Care Center14.1 miTabor, IA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Omaha Nursing and Rehabilitation Center15.0 miOmaha, NE★☆☆☆☆1/5
Emerald Nursing & Rehab Omaha16.2 miOmaha, NE★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
St. Joseph Villa Nursing Center16.2 miOmaha, NE★☆☆☆☆1/5
Chapters Living of Council Bluffs16.5 miCouncil Bluffs, IA★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Douglas County Health Center17.1 miOmaha, NE★★★☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Plattsmouth →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 285104.