MinnesotaTracy

Prairie View Senior Living

250 Fifth Street East, Tracy, MN 56175 · Lyon County · 45 certified beds · avg 42 residents/day · certified since Dec 1, 1986

Part of chain: ACCURA HEALTHCARE (41 facilities, chain avg rating 2.5★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.83
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (23)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 20, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
May 20, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
May 20, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life.
May 20, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide its staff with required training on behavioral health — caring for residents with conditions like dementia, depression, or other mental health needs.
Jul 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Apr 16, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies.
Apr 16, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Apr 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Apr 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Apr 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Apr 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Apr 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · from a complaint
Jul 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jan 31, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Jan 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Jan 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Jan 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months.
Aug 17, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint
Aug 17, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility employed staff who were not licensed, certified, or registered as required by state law. · from a complaint
Aug 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Aug 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202340E
202460E
202590F
202640F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMinnesota avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.834.833.95bottom 9% in Minnesota; top 47% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.681.220.69bottom 6% in Minnesota; top 39% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.394.273.50bottom 8% in Minnesota; top 48% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.250.690.48bottom 4% in Minnesota; bottom 23% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)50.042.245.8bottom 28% in Minnesota; bottom 38% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)50.038.642.9bottom 32% in Minnesota; bottom 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.19, RN 0.56, weekend 2.81. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Individual

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Groff, HowardIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest50%09/03/2008
Sheridan, GailIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest50%08/29/2008
Tealwood Enterprise INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%01/01/2012
American Healthcare Management Services LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2019
Groff, HowardIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/03/2008
Hinrichs, BrianIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Leneave, TedIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2019
Leneave, TedIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2019
Sheridan, GailIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/29/2008
Young, JustinIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Good Samaritan Society - Westbrook15.5 miWestbrook, MN★★★☆☆3/5
Avera Morningside Heights Care Center17.1 miMarshall, MN★★★☆☆2/5
Valley View Manor HCC17.1 miLamberton, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Tracy →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245371.