North CarolinaRoxboro

Person Memorial Hospital

615 Ridge Road, Roxboro, NC 27573 · Person County · 56 certified beds · avg 47 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967

Part of chain: LIFEPOINT HEALTH (8 facilities, chain avg rating 4.1★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$43,074
Fines, last 3 years
3.16
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Nov 25, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Nov 26, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (22)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 17, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Dec 17, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Dec 17, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 17, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Nov 25, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Sep 19, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · from a complaint
Sep 19, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Sep 19, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Sep 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint
Sep 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Sep 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · from a complaint
Sep 19, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman.
Aug 23, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council.
Aug 23, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Aug 23, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Aug 23, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Aug 23, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Aug 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Aug 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
Aug 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required.
Aug 23, 2023B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Aug 23, 2023B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023100E
202470F
202551J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

5 fines totaling $43,074, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Nov 25, 2025Fine$16,153
Nov 25, 2025Payment Denial1 days from Nov 25, 2025
Oct 2, 2023Fine$4,545
Sep 11, 2023Fine$13,635
Aug 28, 2023Fine$4,545
Aug 21, 2023Fine$4,196

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNorth Carolina avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.164.013.95bottom 13% in North Carolina; bottom 20% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.800.640.69top 19% in North Carolina; top 28% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.903.563.50bottom 21% in North Carolina; bottom 26% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.620.410.48top 14% in North Carolina; top 22% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)0.049.045.8
RN turnover (%)0.045.742.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.10, RN 0.78, weekend 2.84. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
DLP Healthcare LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%10/01/2011
DLP Partner LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/01/2011
Historic Lifepoint Hospitals, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/01/2011
Legacy Lifepoint Health LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest01/01/2014
Lifepoint Holdings 2 LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/01/2011
Lifepoint Hospitals Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/01/2011
Beard, BertrandIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2022
Brown, ElliottIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/02/2026
Lawrence, CharlotteIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/24/2022
Monte, ChristopherIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2011
Polite, ElmerIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/14/2020
Poppell, MarcusIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/16/2018
Sensing, PhillipIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/04/2026
Sensing, PhillipIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/04/2026

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Roxboro Healthcare & Rehab Center0.2 miRoxboro, NC★★☆☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 1 closest →

All facilities in Roxboro →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 345004.