Parkview Heights Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
101 N Pine Street, Garnett, KS 66032 · Anderson County · 45 certified beds · avg 42 residents/day · certified since Apr 1, 1998
Part of chain: RECOVER-CARE HEALTHCARE (27 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
All citations in the current public record (24)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. |
| May 21, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. |
| May 21, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| May 21, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. |
| May 21, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. |
| May 21, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems. |
| May 21, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| May 21, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status. |
| Aug 14, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. |
| Aug 14, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. |
| Aug 14, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Aug 14, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Aug 14, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Aug 14, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| Dec 8, 2022 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program. |
| Dec 8, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. |
| Dec 8, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. |
| Dec 8, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Dec 8, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Dec 8, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Dec 8, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Dec 8, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. |
| Dec 8, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. |
| Dec 8, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 8).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 10 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 6 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 8 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Kansas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.54 | 4.58 | 3.95 | top 48% in Kansas; top 22% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.50 | 0.81 | 0.69 | bottom 18% in Kansas; bottom 37% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.17 | 4.05 | 3.50 | top 39% in Kansas; top 18% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.23 | 0.49 | 0.48 | bottom 7% in Kansas; bottom 19% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 39.2 | 48.1 | 45.8 | top 29% in Kansas; top 34% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 20.0 | 42.0 | 42.9 | top 18% in Kansas; top 13% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.77, RN 0.41, weekend 3.46. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BHNV 2 LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/28/2025 |
| Goldstein, Avrohom | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2025 |
| Halberstam, Moshe | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/28/2025 |
| Kansas Healthcare Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/28/2025 |
| Mad Family Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/28/2025 |
| Margulies, Zisha | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/28/2025 |
| MRCMM III LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/28/2025 |
| Natr Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/28/2025 |
| Rarmna Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/28/2025 |
| Ratr Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/28/2025 |
| Recover-Care Heartland LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/28/2025 |
| Recover-Care SNF Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/28/2025 |
| RNR Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/28/2025 |
| Wetr Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/28/2025 |
| Cubit, Suzanna | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/28/2025 |
| Kansas Healthcare Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/28/2025 |
| Karnes, Casey | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/29/2024 |
| Karnes, Casey | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/12/2025 |
| Mad Family Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/28/2025 |
| Margulies, Zisha | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/28/2025 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How do you monitor residents' weight and eating, and what happens when someone starts losing weight?"
- "What systems do you use to prevent medication errors, and what happens when one occurs?"
- "How do you handle residents who need modified food textures, and how do you make those meals appetizing?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "How do you handle COVID-19 vaccination for residents and staff, and what happens during an outbreak?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anderson County Hospital LTCU | 0.7 mi | Garnett, KS | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Richmond Healthcare & Rehab Center | 7.9 mi | Richmond, KS | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 2 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 175433.