Park View Haven Nursing Home
309 North Madison Street, Coleridge, NE 68727 · Cedar County · 34 certified beds · avg 23 residents/day · certified since Jul 28, 1986
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 28, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Feb 28, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (13)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2026 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Apr 9, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. |
| Apr 9, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Apr 9, 2026 | B · Minimal risk, repeated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. |
| Jan 28, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Jan 28, 2025 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Jan 28, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint |
| Sep 4, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint |
| Sep 4, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Jan 22, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility hired someone with an official finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft against them. Facilities are not allowed to employ people with such findings. |
| Jan 22, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. |
| Jan 22, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint |
| Jan 22, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 4).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 3 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 4 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
1 fine totaling $34,512, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2025 | Fine | $34,512 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Payment Denial | 7 days from Feb 21, 2025 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Nebraska avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.67 | 4.33 | 3.95 | top 35% in Nebraska; top 19% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.94 | 0.72 | 0.69 | top 20% in Nebraska; top 19% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.16 | 3.79 | 3.50 | top 29% in Nebraska; top 19% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.62 | 0.47 | 0.48 | top 21% in Nebraska; top 21% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 72.2 | 48.7 | 45.8 | bottom 9% in Nebraska; bottom 4% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 71.4 | 44.1 | 42.9 | bottom 18% in Nebraska; bottom 11% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.03, RN 0.81, weekend 3.59. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Who owns this facility
Non profit - Other
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Village of Coleridge | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 08/01/1972 |
| Cook, Terrill | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2024 |
| Cook, Terrill | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2024 |
| Cook, Terrill | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2024 |
| Frerichs, Chad | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2022 |
| Frerichs, Chad | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2022 |
| Hefner, George | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/1991 |
| Hefner, George | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/1991 |
| Kalin, Tony | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2024 |
| Kalin, Tony | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2024 |
| Lage, Brenda | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2023 |
| Lage, Brenda | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2023 |
| Mosel, Nancy | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/25/2021 |
| Mosel, Nancy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/25/2021 |
| Mosel, Nancy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/19/2025 |
| Recob, Samuel | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2019 |
| Recob, Samuel | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2019 |
| Village of Coleridge | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/1972 |
| Village of Coleridge | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/1972 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "How do you explain health changes and treatment options to residents and their families?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Before any service that isn't covered by Medicare or Medicaid, how will you notify us and get our agreement?"
- "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
- "How do you screen job applicants for past findings of abuse, neglect, or theft before hiring?"
- "How do you identify and arrange specialized services for residents with mental health conditions or disabilities?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accura Healthcare of Hartington | 8.2 mi | Hartington, NE | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Colonial Manor of Randolph | 12.2 mi | Randolph, NE | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 2 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 285073.