NebraskaRandolph

Colonial Manor of Randolph

811 South Main Street, Randolph, NE 68771 · Cedar County · 45 certified beds · avg 37 residents/day · certified since Apr 1, 1996

Part of chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP (342 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.99
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (23)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 14, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Dec 10, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 10, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Dec 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility hired someone with an official finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft against them. Facilities are not allowed to employ people with such findings. · from a complaint
Dec 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Dec 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Dec 10, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Nov 24, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. · from a complaint
Nov 24, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · from a complaint
Nov 24, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint
Nov 24, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Nov 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Nov 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Oct 3, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Oct 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Oct 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Oct 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Oct 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · from a complaint
Oct 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 14, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (7 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202330E
202470F
2025120F
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

0 fines totaling $0, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Oct 3, 2024Payment Denial2 days from Nov 13, 2024

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNebraska avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.994.333.95bottom 40% in Nebraska; top 40% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.860.720.69top 30% in Nebraska; top 23% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.373.793.50bottom 31% in Nebraska; top 49% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.340.470.48bottom 35% in Nebraska; bottom 40% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)0.048.745.8
RN turnover (%)0.044.142.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.63, RN 0.78, weekend 3.06. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Burnam, SoonIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/18/2011
Burnam, SoonIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/14/2025
Caretrust GP LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/18/2011
Caretrust Reit INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/18/2011
Ctr Partnership LPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/18/2011
Ensign Services INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/11/2011
Helenthal, TaraIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2021
Helping Hands Nursing Solution INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/18/2011
Jorgensen, DavidIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Keetch, ChadIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2011
Onshift INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/18/2011
Port, BarryIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/14/2025
Prairie Health Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/18/2011
Recob, SamuelIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/26/2018
Recob, SamuelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/26/2018
Recob, SamuelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/14/2025
Sato, AmiIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/09/2024
Stokes, MatthewIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/31/2015
Stokes, MatthewIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/31/2015
Stokes, MatthewIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/14/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Park View Haven Nursing Home12.2 miColeridge, NE★★★☆☆3/5
Accura Healthcare of Pierce14.6 miPierce, NE★★★☆☆4/5
Accura Healthcare of Hartington17.7 miHartington, NE★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Randolph →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 285183.