1600 Sleater Kinney Road SE, Lacey, WA 98503 (opens Google Maps) · Thurston County · (360) 456-0111· 155 certified beds · avg 116 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jan 27, 2026 · F-0686
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Feb 25, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · May 12, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 13, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jun 11, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jul 5, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 25 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. F-0686
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. F-0881
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. · F-0881 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. · F-0605 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jul 18, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Jul 18, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| May 12, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jan 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint · F-0641 |
| Jan 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Oct 15, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Oct 15, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Oct 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Oct 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · F-0694 |
| Oct 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jun 11, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jun 11, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658 |
| Nov 13, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Nov 13, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. · F-0849 |
| Nov 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Nov 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Nov 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Nov 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Nov 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Nov 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 5).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 8 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 7 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 5 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 5 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
2 fines totaling $42,904.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2026 | Fine | $31,714 |
| May 12, 2025 | Fine | $11,190 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Washington avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.58 | 4.24 | 3.95 | top 21% in Washington; top 21% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.82 | 0.91 | 0.69 | bottom 49% in Washington; top 26% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.78 | 3.69 | 3.50 | top 28% in Washington; top 30% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.61 | 0.67 | 0.48 | bottom 45% in Washington; top 23% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 28.9 | 45.1 | 45.8 | top 11% in Washington; top 12% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 21.7 | 45.4 | 42.9 | top 7% in Washington; top 17% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.07, RN 0.91, weekend 4.19.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (5.07 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Panorama City Conv & Rehab Ctr. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flemming, Stanley | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2022 |
| Wilkerson, Dennis | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/04/2017 |
| Flemming, Stanley | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2022 |
| Flemming, Stanley | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2022 |
| Gavin, William | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2001 |
| Gavin, William | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2001 |
| Goldberg, Frederick | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/1990 |
| Goldberg, Frederick | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/1990 |
| Hedden, Dale | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/31/2023 |
| Hedden, Dale | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/31/2023 |
| Jensen, Daryl | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/1999 |
| Jensen, Daryl | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/1999 |
| Madden, Kathryn | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2017 |
| Madden, Kathryn | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2017 |
| Mah, Douglas | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/26/2023 |
| Mah, Douglas | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/26/2023 |
| Mason, Nancy | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2009 |
| Mason, Nancy | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2009 |
| Murphy, Judy | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/30/2023 |
| Murphy, Judy | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/30/2023 |
Showing 20 of 25 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 5 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Woodard Creek Health & Rehabilitation | 1.4 mi | Olympia, WA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Olympia Transitional Care and Rehabilitation | 1.6 mi | Olympia, WA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Crystal Cove Post Acute | 1.9 mi | Lacey, WA | —/5 | SFF | |
| Lacey Post Acute & Rehabilitation | 2.1 mi | Lacey, WA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Regency Olympia Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 2.4 mi | Olympia, WA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Puget Sound Care | 5.7 mi | Olympia, WA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| The Oaks at Lakewood | 17.7 mi | Tacoma, WA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Agility Health and Rehabilitation | 18.6 mi | University Place, WA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Fir Lane Care | 19.0 mi | Shelton, WA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Shelton Health and Rehabilitation | 19.2 mi | Shelton, WA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Birch Creek Post Acute & Rehabilitation | 19.7 mi | Tacoma, WA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Orchard Park Health Care & Rehab Center | 20.0 mi | Tacoma, WA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 505059.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details