510 E 8th St, Freeman, SD 57029 (opens Google Maps) · Hutchinson County · (605) 925-4000· 45 certified beds · avg 37 residents/day · certified since Feb 1, 1998 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jan 18, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Feb 15, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Feb 15, 2023 · F-0686
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 11, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 11 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. F-0732
The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. F-0655
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
| Jun 26, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Jun 26, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jun 26, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Jun 26, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Jun 26, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jun 26, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jan 18, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jan 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Jan 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · F-0604 |
| Feb 15, 2023 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 6).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2024 | 3 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 7 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $10,839.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2024 | Fine | $10,839 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | South Dakota avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.63 | 4.32 | 3.95 | top 10% in South Dakota; top 6% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.20 | 0.91 | 0.69 | top 17% in South Dakota; top 9% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 5.13 | 3.71 | 3.50 | top 8% in South Dakota; top 5% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.67 | 0.51 | 0.48 | top 19% in South Dakota; top 18% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 23.4 | 48.2 | 45.8 | top 1% in South Dakota; top 5% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 22.2 | 34.7 | 42.9 | top 31% in South Dakota; top 17% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.44, RN 0.95, weekend 4.04.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.44 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Oakview Terrace. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Freeman Regional Health Services | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 07/01/1971 |
| Aanenson, Jason | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2004 |
| Becker, Cameron | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2014 |
| Freeman Regional Health Services | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/1971 |
| Freeman Regional Health Services | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/1971 |
| Fuhrman, Steve | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2008 |
| Hafiz, Shakil | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2023 |
| Hafiz, Shakil | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2023 |
| Husher, Phillip | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/30/2017 |
| Julson, James | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2005 |
| Mutchelknaus, Cynthia | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2014 |
| Schmeichel, Steve | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2023 |
| Uecker, Lori | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2007 |
| Unruh, Courtney | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/14/2015 |
| Unruh, Courtney | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/14/2015 |
| Unruh, Courtney | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/14/2015 |
| Vetch, Shane | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2023 |
All 17 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tieszen Memorial Home | 10.4 mi | Marion, SD | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Menno-Olivet Care Center | 10.4 mi | Menno, SD | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Diamond Care Center | 14.9 mi | Bridgewater, SD | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Good Samaritan Society Canistota | 18.6 mi | Canistota, SD | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Good Samaritan Society Scotland | 19.5 mi | Scotland, SD | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Hutchinson, SD — 3 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 435112.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details