IdahoKimberly

Oak Creek Rehabilitation Center of Kimberly

500 Polk Street East, Kimberly, ID 83341 · Twin Falls County · 57 certified beds · avg 36 residents/day · certified since Sep 1, 1981

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

Part of chain: CASCADES HEALTHCARE (19 facilities, chain avg rating 1.9★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$13,627
Fines, last 3 years
2.84
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jul 4, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jun 25, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jul 4, 2024 · F-0609 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.

Why it matters: When incidents aren't reported promptly, abusers may continue harming residents and outside authorities can't step in.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jun 25, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (16)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 5, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not notify the appropriate authorities when a resident with a mental disorder or intellectual disability had a significant change in condition. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurse aides were properly trained — aides working more than 4 months must be trained and competent, and newer aides must be enrolled in training. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint
Jul 4, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jul 4, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 14).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202422J ▲
2025140E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $13,627.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jul 4, 2024Fine$13,627

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityIdaho avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.844.033.95bottom 6% in Idaho; bottom 9% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.400.870.69bottom 6% in Idaho; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.563.483.50bottom 9% in Idaho; bottom 11% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.360.560.48bottom 22% in Idaho; bottom 44% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)72.250.345.8bottom 5% in Idaho; bottom 4% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)62.541.042.9bottom 15% in Idaho; bottom 19% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.59, RN 0.50, weekend 3.22. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
BRP Health Management Systems INCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest12/01/2010
Charolais Care II, INCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2008
Snake River Healthcare LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest11/01/2018
BRP Health Management Systems INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2025
Burley Skilled Nursing Facility, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2008
Crump, JasonIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2018
Crump, JasonIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2018
Fullmer, ChadIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2018
Fullmer, ChadIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2018
Gies, FlorianIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2018
Gies, FlorianIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/16/2025
Herrera, JerriIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2025
McSpadden, DarinIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2018
McSpadden, DarinIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2021
Moore, ThomasIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2018
Moore, ThomasIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2018
White, DerekIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2021
White, DerekIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2018

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Twin Falls Transitional Care of Cascadia4.2 miTwin Falls, ID★★★★★4/5
Serenity Transitional Care7.4 miTwin Falls, ID★★★☆☆2/5
Bridgeview Estates11.2 miTwin Falls, ID★★★☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Kimberly →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 135084.