North Starr Postacute Care

Name: North Starr Postacute Care
Address: 180 STARR AVENUE, Turlock, CA, 95380, US
Telephone: 2096321075

180 Starr Avenue, Turlock, CA 95380 · Stanislaus County · 31 certified beds · avg 26 residents/day · certified since Mar 1, 1989 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: RMG CAPITAL PARTNERS (9 facilities, chain avg rating 2.6★)

4/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

3.94

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Aug 20, 2025 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Sep 15, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (23)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
May 8, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
May 8, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
May 8, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
May 8, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
May 8, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
May 8, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 8, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 20, 2025	▲ G · Actual harm, one-off	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Sep 13, 2024	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Sep 13, 2024	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not train its staff on dementia care and on recognizing and reporting abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
Sep 13, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Sep 13, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Sep 13, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Sep 13, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Sep 13, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Sep 13, 2024	C · Minimal risk, facility-wide	The facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms.
May 6, 2022	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
May 6, 2022	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 6, 2022	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 6, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
May 6, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
May 6, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 6, 2022	B · Minimal risk, repeated	The facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (8 → 7).

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2022	7	0	E
2024	8	0	F
2025	1	1	G ▲
2026	7	0	D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	California avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.94	4.31	3.95	bottom 37% in California; top 42% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.38	0.61	0.69	bottom 28% in California; bottom 20% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	3.77	3.90	3.50	top 48% in California; top 30% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.39	0.51	0.48	top 46% in California; top 49% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	38.2	36.7	45.8	bottom 43% in California; top 32% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	0.0	38.1	42.9	—

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.94, RN 0.38, weekend 3.78. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Bansal, Jagan	Individual	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	50%	04/17/2023
Bansal, Maneesh	Individual	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	50%	04/17/2023
RMG Capital Partners, LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	100%	01/01/2019
Bansal, Jagan	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	03/30/2015
Bansal, Maneesh	Individual	W-2 Managing Employee	NOT APPLICABLE	03/30/2015
Bansal, Maneesh	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	03/03/2015
Bansal, Maneesh	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	03/30/2015
Bansal, Maneesh	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	03/30/2015
Reliant Management Group, LLC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/2015

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
"If my family member's health suddenly changes, how quickly do you reassess them and update their care?"
"How do you identify and arrange specialized services for residents with mental health conditions or disabilities?"
"Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
"How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
"Where do you post your daily staffing numbers, and can I see today's?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection
Main West Postacute Care	0.9 mi	Turlock, CA	★★★☆☆	4/5
Covenant Village Care Center	0.9 mi	Turlock, CA	★★★★☆	4/5
Turlock Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	1.0 mi	Turlock, CA	★★★☆☆	2/5
Ceres Postacute Care	9.7 mi	Ceres, CA	★★★☆☆	3/5
Grace Home INC.	11.0 mi	Livingston, CA	★★★★★	5/5
River View Post Acute	12.2 mi	Modesto, CA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Crestwood Manor	13.4 mi	Modesto, CA	★★★★★	5/5
Valley Skilled Nursing Center	13.5 mi	Modesto, CA	★★★★☆	4/5
Modesto Post Acute Center	13.5 mi	Modesto, CA	★★★★★	4/5
Golden Modesto Care Center	13.6 mi	Modesto, CA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Garden City Healthcare Center	14.4 mi	Modesto, CA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Almond Vista Healthcare	15.1 mi	Modesto, CA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Turlock →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555347.

The Care File

Visit checklist — North Starr Postacute Care

180 Starr Avenue, Turlock, CA 95380 · 2096321075

Health inspection rating 4/5 · CMS overall 4/5· Fines (3y): $0

Most serious findings on record:

▲ Aug 20, 2025 (F-0686, Actual harm, one-off): The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
☐ "If my family member's health suddenly changes, how quickly do you reassess them and update their care?"
☐ "How do you identify and arrange specialized services for residents with mental health conditions or disabilities?"
☐ "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
☐ "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
☐ "Where do you post your daily staffing numbers, and can I see today's?"
☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 555347 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)