How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Maplewood Park Place
9707 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814 (opens Google Maps) · Montgomery County · (301) 530-0500· 31 certified beds · avg 17 residents/day · certified since May 7, 1996 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Mar 10, 2025
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Aug 2, 2019
$0
Fines, last 3 years
—
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Aug 2, 2019 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Aug 2, 2019 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Sep 20, 2019 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 5 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. F-0684
The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. F-0759
View all 5 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Mar 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Mar 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Aug 2, 2019 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Aug 2, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
Inspection trend by year
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2019
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2025
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 2 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 3 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityMaryland averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: Not reported
Maryland average: 3.83
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: Not reported
Maryland average: 0.83
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: Not reported
Maryland average: 3.43
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Maryland avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | — | 3.83 | 3.95 | — |
| Registered Nurse hours | — | 0.83 | 0.69 | — |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | — | 3.43 | 3.50 | — |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | — | 0.63 | 0.48 | — |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | — | 40.2 | 45.8 | — |
| RN turnover (%) | — | 38.7 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total —, RN —, weekend —.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (— here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: —/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Maplewood Park Place. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coelho, Andrew | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/12/2009 |
| Coelho, Andrew | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/12/2009 |
| Dorazio, Michael | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/16/2024 |
| Dorazio, Michael | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/16/2024 |
| Falco, Denise | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/23/2022 |
| Falco, Denise | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/23/2022 |
| Frantz, Edward | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/16/2015 |
| Frantz, Edward | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/16/2015 |
| Fried, Leslie | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2004 |
| Fried, Leslie | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2004 |
| Gallagher, Elizabeth | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/14/2023 |
| Gallagher, Elizabeth | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/14/2023 |
| Harry, Barbara | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/20/2005 |
| Harry, Barbara | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/20/2005 |
| Hotvedt, Richard | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/16/2024 |
| Hotvedt, Richard | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/16/2024 |
| May, Catherine | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2013 |
| May, Catherine | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2013 |
| Moretti, Anna | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2023 |
| Moretti, Anna | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2023 |
Showing 20 of 36 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 16 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
- "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 36 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 89 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sterling Care Bethesda | 0.7 mi | Bethesda, MD | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Montcare at Bethesda | 1.0 mi | Bethesda, MD | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Carriage Hill Bethesda | 1.0 mi | Bethesda, MD | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Tuckerman Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 1.1 mi | North Bethesda, MD | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Hebrew Home of Greater Washington | 2.7 mi | Rockville, MD | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Autumn Lake Healthcare at Chevy Chase | 3.0 mi | Chevy Chase, MD | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Autumn Lake Healthcare at Oakview | 3.3 mi | Silver Spring, MD | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Turtle Creek Rehabilitation and Wellness Center | 3.3 mi | Kensington, MD | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Complete Care at Wheaton | 3.7 mi | Wheaton, MD | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Lisner Louise Dickson Hurthome | 4.0 mi | Washington, DC | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Woodside Rehab & Nursing | 4.1 mi | Silver Spring, MD | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Fox Chase Healthcare | 4.2 mi | Silver Spring, MD | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Montgomery, MD — 34 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Montcare at Potomac — Potomac, MD · overall 5/5
- Montcare at Wheaton — Wheaton, MD · overall 3/5
- Montgomery Village Care Center — Gaithersburg, MD · overall 5/5
- Potomac Valley Rehabilitation and Healthcare — Rockville, MD · overall 3/5
- Shady Grove Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Rockville, MD · overall 2/5
- Sligo Creek Healthcare — Takoma Park, MD · overall 3/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 215287.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).