How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
400 Sexton Street, Struthers, OH 44471 (opens Google Maps) · Mahoning County · (330) 755-1466· 55 certified beds · avg 50 residents/day · certified since Mar 1, 2000 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Apr 14, 2025 · F-0686
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: May 6, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. F-0686
The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. F-0578
The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. F-0694
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Apr 14, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Apr 14, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · F-0694 |
| Apr 14, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Apr 14, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems. · F-0805 |
| Apr 14, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Apr 14, 2025 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms. · F-0912 |
| Jun 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686 |
| Feb 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Sep 8, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Sep 8, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Sep 8, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Sep 8, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Sep 8, 2022 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms. · F-0912 |
| Aug 29, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Aug 29, 2019 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Aug 29, 2019 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms. · F-0912 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 7).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2022 | 5 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 7 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Ohio avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.86 | 3.45 | 3.95 | top 4% in Ohio; top 16% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.11 | 0.60 | 0.69 | top 4% in Ohio; top 12% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.01 | 3.07 | 3.50 | top 7% in Ohio; top 23% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.52 | 0.42 | 0.48 | top 24% in Ohio; top 31% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 40.0 | 48.7 | 45.8 | top 27% in Ohio; top 36% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 50.0 | 43.9 | 42.9 | bottom 43% in Ohio; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.05, RN 0.93, weekend 3.34.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.05 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Maplecrest Nursing and Hta. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daprile, Christopher | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 50% | 01/01/2003 |
| Daprile, Lisa | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 50% | 01/01/2003 |
| Maplecrest Holding Co INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 01/01/2003 |
| Ansell, Clinton | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/13/2021 |
| Ansell, Clinton | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/13/2021 |
| Daprile, Christopher | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2003 |
| Daprile, Christopher | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2003 |
| Daprile, Christopher | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2003 |
| Daprile, Lisa | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2003 |
| Daprile, Lisa | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2003 |
| Daprile, Lisa | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2003 |
| Daprile, Lisa | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2003 |
| Kost, Tamara | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/23/2024 |
| Kost, Tamara | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/23/2024 |
| Maplecrest Holding Co INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2003 |
| Maplecrest Holding Co INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2003 |
| Ricciardi, Santuccio | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2007 |
| Ricciardi, Santuccio | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2007 |
All 18 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Park Center Healthcare and Rehabilitation | 1.8 mi | Youngstown, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Lincoln Knolls Health & Rehab LLC | 3.0 mi | Youngstown, OH | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Oasis Center for Rehabilitation and Healing | 3.0 mi | Youngstown, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Beeghly Oaks Center for Rehabilitation & Healing | 3.3 mi | Youngstown, OH | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Greenbriar Center | 3.7 mi | Boardman, OH | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Shepherd of the Valley-Boardman | 4.4 mi | Youngstown, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Vista Center of Boardman | 4.6 mi | Boardman, OH | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Hampton Woods Nursing Center, INC | 4.6 mi | Poland, OH | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Center for Rehabilitation at Hampton Woods the | 4.6 mi | Poland, OH | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Park Vista Nursing and Rehab | 4.9 mi | Youngstown, OH | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Briarfield Place | 5.0 mi | Boardman, OH | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Canfield Healthcare Center | 5.0 mi | Youngstown, OH | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Mahoning, OH — 29 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 366191.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details