How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
601 Lutz Road, Bloomington, IL 61704 (opens Google Maps) · Mc Lean County · (309) 664-5940· 19 certified beds · avg 17 residents/day · certified since Oct 1, 2017 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jan 29, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Feb 21, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 21 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint F-0842
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
The facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. F-0801
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Nov 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Aug 1, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. · F-0801 |
| Aug 1, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Aug 1, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Aug 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600 |
| Aug 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Aug 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Aug 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly plan a resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs after leaving. · F-0660 |
| Aug 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Aug 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Aug 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Aug 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · F-0806 |
| Aug 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. · F-0881 |
| Feb 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jan 29, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jan 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580 |
| Aug 2, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Jun 22, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jun 22, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Jun 22, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 12).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 3 | 0 | F |
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 15 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 2 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Illinois avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.98 | 2.99 | 3.95 | top 17% in Illinois; top 40% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.26 | 0.63 | 0.69 | top 8% in Illinois; top 8% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.70 | 2.67 | 3.50 | top 14% in Illinois; top 33% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.92 | 0.56 | 0.48 | top 13% in Illinois; top 8% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 61.5 | 44.5 | 45.8 | bottom 12% in Illinois; bottom 14% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 57.1 | 41.8 | 42.9 | bottom 25% in Illinois; bottom 26% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.91, RN 1.24, weekend 3.64.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.91 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Luther Oaks. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bentley, Meredith | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/14/2020 |
| Bentley, Meredith | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/14/2020 |
| Black, Terri | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
| Black, Terri | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
| Lacroix, Amy | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/03/2022 |
| Lacroix, Amy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/03/2022 |
| Lau, Daniel | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Lau, Daniel | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Lutheran Life Communities | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2012 |
| Lutheran Life Ministries | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2012 |
| Old National Bank | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/17/1992 |
| Renetzky, Michael | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2003 |
| Renetzky, Michael | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2003 |
| Richter and Associates | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2022 |
| Select Rehabilitation, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Select Rehabilitation, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/04/2025 |
| Thomas Management LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Thomas Management LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/14/2025 |
| Wiedman, Peter | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/18/2024 |
| Wiedman, Peter | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/18/2024 |
All 20 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Westminster Village | 3.0 mi | Bloomington, IL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Goldwater Care Bloomington | 3.3 mi | Bloomington, IL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Arcadia Care Bloomington | 3.3 mi | Bloomington, IL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Loft Rehab & Nursing of Normal | 4.5 mi | Normal, IL | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Arc at Normal | 4.9 mi | Normal, IL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| McLean County Nursing Home | 5.5 mi | Normal, IL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 146184.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details