KansasLa Crosse

Locust Grove Village

701 W 6th Street, La Crosse, KS 67548 · Rush County · 38 certified beds · avg 35 residents/day · certified since Jun 1, 1996 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$12,779
Fines, last 3 years
5.31
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Aug 14, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Sep 2, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (11)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Aug 14, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Sep 11, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service.
Sep 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Sep 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Sep 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Sep 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Sep 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Jan 31, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 31, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jan 31, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Jan 31, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202340E
202460F
202511J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $12,779.

DateTypeAmount / length
Aug 14, 2025Fine$12,779

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityKansas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.314.583.95top 22% in Kansas; top 9% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.960.810.69top 28% in Kansas; top 18% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.584.053.50top 28% in Kansas; top 11% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.410.490.48bottom 43% in Kansas; top 46% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)52.548.145.8bottom 36% in Kansas; bottom 31% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.042.042.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.27, RN 0.77, weekend 3.68. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Aldrich, TroyIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE03/28/2024
Aldrich, TroyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/28/2024
Aldrich, TroyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/28/2024
Aldrich, TroyIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/28/2024
Aldrich, TroyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/28/2024
Baalmann, RuthIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE06/27/2013
Baalmann, RuthIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/27/2013
Baalmann, RuthIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/27/2013
Baalmann, RuthIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/27/2013
Baalmann, RuthIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/27/2013
Baalmann, RuthIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/27/2013
Basgall, TonyaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE09/22/2016
Basgall, TonyaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/22/2016
Basgall, TonyaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/23/2024
Basgall, TonyaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/22/2016
Basgall, TonyaIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/22/2016
Basgall, TonyaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/22/2016
Bland & Associates, P.C.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/23/2022
Depperschmidt, AmyIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE09/24/2020
Depperschmidt, AmyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/24/2020

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Via Christi Village Hays KS LLC24.2 miHays, KS★☆☆☆☆1/5
Good Samaritan - Hays24.7 miHays, KS★★★★★5/5
Diversicare of Larned25.9 miLarned, KS★★★★★4/5
Medicalodges Great Bend28.7 miGreat Bend, KS★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Azria Health Great Bend30.5 miGreat Bend, KS★★☆☆☆2/5
Good Samaritan - Ellis31.2 miEllis, KS★★★★★4/5
Ness County Hospital LTCU DBA Cedar Village33.1 miNess City, KS★★★☆☆3/5
Wheatland Nursing & Rehabilitation Center34.0 miRussell, KS★★★★★5/5
Russell Regional Hospital LTCU34.2 miRussell, KS★☆☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in La Crosse →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 175369.