Lecom at Snyder Memorial

Name: Lecom at Snyder Memorial
Address: 156 SNYDER MEMORIAL RD, Marienville, PA, 16239, US
Telephone: 8149276670

156 Snyder Memorial Rd, Marienville, PA 16239 · Forest County · 100 certified beds · avg 97 residents/day · certified since Jun 24, 1987

2/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

$25,853

Fines, last 3 years

3.95

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Mar 6, 2024 · F-0678 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.

Why it matters: In a cardiac or breathing emergency, failure to start CPR promptly can be the difference between life and death.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Mar 26, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (26)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
May 29, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit.
May 29, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
May 29, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
May 29, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 29, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 29, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
May 8, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
May 8, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
May 8, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 8, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
May 8, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months.
Oct 2, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Jun 18, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jun 18, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 18, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council.
Jun 18, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jun 18, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Mar 6, 2024	▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeated	The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. · from a complaint
Mar 6, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint
Mar 6, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Nov 22, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Nov 22, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Sep 22, 2023	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Sep 5, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Sep 5, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · from a complaint
Sep 5, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 6).

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2023	6	0	F
2024	9	1	K ▲
2025	5	0	E
2026	6	0	E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $25,853.

Date	Type	Amount / length
Mar 6, 2024	Fine	$25,853

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Pennsylvania avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.95	3.94	3.95	top 39% in Pennsylvania; top 42% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.51	0.80	0.69	bottom 27% in Pennsylvania; bottom 39% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	3.42	3.58	3.50	top 45% in Pennsylvania; top 46% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.30	0.56	0.48	bottom 22% in Pennsylvania; bottom 33% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	0.0	44.5	45.8	—
RN turnover (%)	0.0	39.9	42.9	—

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.76, RN 0.48, weekend 3.26. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Babiak, Jaime	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2025
Babiak, Jaime	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2025
Beerbower, Joshua	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2025
Beerbower, Joshua	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2025
Eberlin, Richard	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2025
Eberlin, Richard	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2025
Lin, James	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2025
Lin, James	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2025
Millcreek Manor	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2025
Roscoe, Brandon	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2025
Shuttleworth, Jonathan	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2025
Shuttleworth, Jonathan	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"Are staff on every shift trained and certified in CPR, and how do they know each resident's resuscitation wishes?"
"How often does each resident's doctor visit and review their care in person?"
"What does the care plan for a brand-new resident cover in the first 48 hours, and who writes it?"
"Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
"Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"Can I see where garbage is stored and how often it's removed?"
"Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Dr Arthur Clifton McKinley Ctr	21.6 mi	Brookville, PA	★★★★☆	4/5
Shippenville Nursing and Rehab	21.7 mi	Shippenville, PA	★★★☆☆	3/5
Lutheran Home at Kane, the	21.9 mi	Kane, PA	★★★★★	4/5
Clarion Nursing and Rehab	22.1 mi	Clarion, PA	★★★★☆	4/5
Penn Highlands Jefferson Manor	22.2 mi	Brookville, PA	★★☆☆☆	2/5	abuse
Highland View Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center	22.6 mi	Brockway, PA	★★★★☆	4/5
Warren Manor	25.4 mi	Warren, PA	★★★☆☆	3/5
Kinzua Nursing and Rehab	26.4 mi	Warren, PA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Rouse Warren County Home	27.6 mi	Youngsville, PA	★☆☆☆☆	2/5	abuse
Oil City Nursing and Rehab	27.8 mi	Oil City, PA	★★★★★	5/5
Elk Haven Nursing Home	28.8 mi	Saint Marys, PA	★★★★★	4/5
Pinecrest Manor	28.9 mi	St Marys, PA	★★★★☆	4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Marienville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395728.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Lecom at Snyder Memorial

156 Snyder Memorial Rd, Marienville, PA 16239 · 8149276670

Health inspection rating 2/5 · CMS overall 2/5· Fines (3y): $25,853

Most serious findings on record:

▲ Mar 6, 2024 (F-0678, Immediate jeopardy, repeated): The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "Are staff on every shift trained and certified in CPR, and how do they know each resident's resuscitation wishes?"
☐ "How often does each resident's doctor visit and review their care in person?"
☐ "What does the care plan for a brand-new resident cover in the first 48 hours, and who writes it?"
☐ "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
☐ "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "Can I see where garbage is stored and how often it's removed?"
☐ "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 395728 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)