ColoradoLakewood

Lakewood Villa

1625 Simms St, Lakewood, CO 80215 · Jefferson County · 57 certified beds · avg 54 residents/day · certified since Jun 1, 2013 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: MADISON CREEK PARTNERS (13 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
5
Serious findings on record
$16,801
Fines, last 3 years
3.43
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · May 1, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Feb 7, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jul 17, 2023 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Aug 9, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jul 17, 2023 · F-0692

The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.

Why it matters: Malnutrition and dehydration can quickly weaken a resident and lead to serious complications.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Aug 9, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Oct 31, 2019 · F-0600

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Nov 22, 2019 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Oct 31, 2019 · F-0744

The facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience.

Why it matters: Poor dementia care can lead to distress, unsafe wandering, or unnecessary sedating medication.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Dec 2, 2019 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (21)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jul 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Mar 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Dec 19, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 19, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Dec 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Dec 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Dec 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
May 1, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jan 25, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · from a complaint
Jan 25, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint
Jul 17, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jul 17, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Jul 17, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 17, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jul 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences.
Jul 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Jul 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Oct 31, 2019▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Oct 31, 2019▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience.
Oct 31, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough fresh-air ventilation, whether through windows, mechanical systems, or both.
Oct 31, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201942G ▲
202372G ▲
202481J ▲
202520D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $16,801.

DateTypeAmount / length
May 1, 2024Fine$16,801

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityColorado avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.433.893.95bottom 32% in Colorado; bottom 33% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.680.860.69bottom 35% in Colorado; top 38% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.213.443.50bottom 44% in Colorado; bottom 42% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.510.610.48bottom 45% in Colorado; top 32% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)46.347.145.8top 49% in Colorado; bottom 46% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)63.644.642.9bottom 15% in Colorado; bottom 17% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.10, RN 0.62, weekend 2.91. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Chief Joseph Trail, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%03/02/2026
Clegg, MichaelIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest03/02/2026
Tippet, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest03/02/2026
White Canyon, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest03/02/2026
Christensen, CoveyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2013
Christensen, CoveyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2013
Clegg, MichaelIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE06/26/2023
Clegg, MichaelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/26/2023
Clegg, MichaelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/26/2023
Hopkins, AmberIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2021
Hopkins, AmberIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2021
Howe, RobertIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2018
Howe, RobertIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2018
Ikerd, JohnIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE03/02/2026
Ikerd, JohnIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/25/2022
Ikerd, JohnIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/25/2022
James, KendraIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2023
James, KendraIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2023
Madison Creek Partners LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2013
Madison Creek Partners LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/13/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Ahc of Lakewood, LLC0.5 miLakewood, CO★★★★★5/5
Western Hills Health Care Center2.1 miLakewood, CO★★★☆☆3/5
Allison Care Center2.1 miLakewood, CO★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Harmony Pointe Care Center2.7 miLakewood, CO★★★☆☆2/5
Mountain Vista Health Center2.9 miWheat Ridge, CO★★☆☆☆2/5
Lakeside Post Acute3.7 miWheat Ridge, CO★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Edgewater Health and Rehabilitation3.7 miLakewood, CO★★★★★4/5
Cedars Healthcare Center3.7 miLakewood, CO★★★☆☆2/5
Cambridge Care Center3.7 miLakewood, CO★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Sierra Post Acute3.7 miLakewood, CO★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Villa Manor Care Center3.8 miLakewood, CO★★★★☆3/5
Wheatridge Care Center3.9 miWheat Ridge, CO★★★☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Lakewood →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 065408.