Lake Orion Nursing Center
585 East Flint Street, Lake Orion, MI 48362 · Oakland County · 120 certified beds · avg 95 residents/day · certified since Feb 21, 1989
Abuse citation flag (CMS)
The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Sep 10, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Nov 10, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jun 16, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Jul 15, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 25, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Mar 9, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)
All citations in the current public record (22)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Dec 23, 2025 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint |
| Dec 23, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint |
| Sep 10, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Sep 10, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety. · from a complaint |
| Jun 16, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| May 1, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| May 1, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| May 1, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. |
| May 1, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| Mar 25, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Jan 29, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Mar 26, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Mar 26, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint |
| Mar 26, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. |
| Mar 26, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. |
| Mar 26, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. |
| Apr 6, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Apr 6, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. |
| Apr 6, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. |
| Apr 6, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Apr 6, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 4).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 5 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 5 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 11 | 3 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
1 fine totaling $89,466, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2025 | Fine | $89,466 |
| Sep 10, 2025 | Payment Denial | 39 days from Oct 2, 2025 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Michigan avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.80 | 4.32 | 3.95 | bottom 28% in Michigan; top 48% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.62 | 0.84 | 0.69 | bottom 30% in Michigan; top 46% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.34 | 3.79 | 3.50 | bottom 28% in Michigan; bottom 49% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.40 | 0.49 | 0.48 | bottom 45% in Michigan; top 49% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 65.2 | 44.1 | 45.8 | bottom 4% in Michigan; bottom 10% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 61.1 | 39.2 | 42.9 | bottom 14% in Michigan; bottom 20% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.59, RN 0.58, weekend 3.15. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Who owns this facility
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| McLaren Health Care Corporation | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/1989 |
| McLaren Oakland | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/1989 |
| Ball, Kevin | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2021 |
| Ball, Kevin | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2021 |
| Grant, Chad | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/12/2022 |
| Grant, Chad | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/12/2022 |
| Hain, Tony | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2004 |
| Hain, Tony | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2004 |
| Incarnati, Philip | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2007 |
| Incarnati, Philip | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2007 |
| Marcotte, Lynn | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2021 |
| Marcotte, Lynn | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2021 |
| Marcotte, Lynn | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2021 |
| Marcotte, Lynn | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2021 |
| Marcotte, Lynn | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2025 |
| Mazurkiewicz, David | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2021 |
| Mazurkiewicz, David | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2021 |
| Mbiya, Mary | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2021 |
| Mbiya, Mary | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2021 |
| McDonald, Derrick | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/19/2015 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "What is your nurse and aide staffing ratio on each shift, including nights and weekends?"
- "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
- "What mental health services do you provide on-site, and who delivers them?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Villa at Silverbell Estates | 4.7 mi | Orion, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Wellbridge of Clarkston | 7.7 mi | Clarkston, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Villa at Pine Place | 7.8 mi | Clarkston, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Springs at Rochester Hills Rehab and Nursing C | 8.0 mi | Rochester Hills, MI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Bellbrook | 9.2 mi | Rochester Hills, MI | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Regency at Waterford | 9.7 mi | Waterford, MI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Oakland Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center LL | 9.8 mi | Pontiac, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Wellbridge of Rochester Hills | 9.8 mi | Rochester Hills, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Lourdes Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 10.4 mi | Waterford, MI | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Orchard Grove Health Campus | 10.9 mi | Romeo, MI | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
All facilities in Lake Orion →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235481.