585 East Flint Street, Lake Orion, MI 48362 (opens Google Maps) · Oakland County · (248) 693-0505· 120 certified beds · avg 95 residents/day · certified since Feb 21, 1989 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Abuse citation flag (CMS)
The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Sep 10, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Nov 10, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jun 16, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jul 15, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Mar 25, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 9, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)
Showing the latest 3 of 22 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint F-0725
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint F-0550
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Dec 23, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint · F-0725 |
| Dec 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint · F-0550 |
| Sep 10, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Sep 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety. · from a complaint · F-0740 |
| Jun 16, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| May 1, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| May 1, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| May 1, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| May 1, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Mar 25, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jan 29, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Mar 26, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Mar 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint · F-0550 |
| Mar 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · F-0552 |
| Mar 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Mar 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Apr 6, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Apr 6, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Apr 6, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Apr 6, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Apr 6, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 4).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 5 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 5 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 11 | 3 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $89,466, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2025 | Fine | $89,466 |
| Sep 10, 2025 | Payment Denial | 39 days from Oct 2, 2025 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Michigan avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.80 | 4.32 | 3.95 | bottom 28% in Michigan; top 48% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.62 | 0.84 | 0.69 | bottom 30% in Michigan; top 46% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.34 | 3.79 | 3.50 | bottom 28% in Michigan; bottom 49% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.40 | 0.49 | 0.48 | bottom 45% in Michigan; top 49% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 65.2 | 44.1 | 45.8 | bottom 4% in Michigan; bottom 10% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 61.1 | 39.2 | 42.9 | bottom 14% in Michigan; bottom 20% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.59, RN 0.58, weekend 3.15.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.59 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Lake Orion Nursing Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| McLaren Health Care Corporation | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/1989 |
| McLaren Oakland | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/1989 |
| Ball, Kevin | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2021 |
| Ball, Kevin | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2021 |
| Grant, Chad | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/12/2022 |
| Grant, Chad | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/12/2022 |
| Hain, Tony | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2004 |
| Hain, Tony | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2004 |
| Incarnati, Philip | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2007 |
| Incarnati, Philip | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2007 |
| Marcotte, Lynn | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2021 |
| Marcotte, Lynn | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2021 |
| Marcotte, Lynn | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2021 |
| Marcotte, Lynn | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2021 |
| Marcotte, Lynn | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2025 |
| Mazurkiewicz, David | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2021 |
| Mazurkiewicz, David | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2021 |
| Mbiya, Mary | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2021 |
| Mbiya, Mary | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2021 |
| McDonald, Derrick | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/19/2015 |
Showing 20 of 32 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 12 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Villa at Silverbell Estates | 4.7 mi | Orion, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Wellbridge of Clarkston | 7.7 mi | Clarkston, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Villa at Pine Place | 7.8 mi | Clarkston, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Springs at Rochester Hills Rehab and Nursing C | 8.0 mi | Rochester Hills, MI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Bellbrook | 9.2 mi | Rochester Hills, MI | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Regency at Waterford | 9.7 mi | Waterford, MI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Oakland Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center LL | 9.8 mi | Pontiac, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Wellbridge of Rochester Hills | 9.8 mi | Rochester Hills, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Lourdes Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 10.4 mi | Waterford, MI | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Orchard Grove Health Campus | 10.9 mi | Romeo, MI | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Wellbridge of Romeo | 11.2 mi | Romeo, MI | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| The Orchards at Canterbury on the Lake | 11.3 mi | Waterford, MI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Oakland, MI — 43 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235481.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details