PennsylvaniaState College

Juniper Village at Brookline-Rehabilitation and SK

1950 Cliffside Drive, State College, PA 16801 · Centre County · 116 certified beds · avg 52 residents/day · certified since May 19, 1988

Part of chain: JUNIPER COMMUNITIES (3 facilities, chain avg rating 4.0★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.92
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (16)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 6, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 6, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience.
Apr 25, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Apr 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Apr 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Apr 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Apr 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 16, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
May 16, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
May 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
May 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
May 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
May 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
May 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience.
May 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 2).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202490E
202550E
202620E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityPennsylvania avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.923.943.95top 15% in Pennsylvania; top 15% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.950.800.69top 22% in Pennsylvania; top 18% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.963.583.50top 26% in Pennsylvania; top 24% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.500.560.48top 41% in Pennsylvania; top 33% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)45.544.545.8bottom 48% in Pennsylvania; bottom 49% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)33.339.942.9top 37% in Pennsylvania; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.65, RN 0.90, weekend 3.75. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Copperhill Associates LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest12%04/10/2014
Falcon Capital LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest99%04/10/2014
Poitras, JamesIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest15%04/10/2014
Poitras, PatriciaIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest15%04/10/2014
Breneman, DonaldIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE03/21/2019
Byrne, DianeIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE03/21/2019
Donato, LindaIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE04/10/2014
Juniper Management, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/10/2014
Juniper Village at State College Operations II LLCOrganizationLimited Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/06/2014

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Foxdale Village0.5 miState College, PA★★★★★4/5
Embassy of Hearthside1.6 miState College, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Village at Penn State, the3.1 miState College, PA★★★★☆3/5
Centre Care Rehabilitation and Wellness Services4.2 miBellefonte, PA★★★☆☆3/5
Valley View Haven, INC13.8 miBelleville, PA★★★★★4/5
William Penn Nursing and Rehab17.9 miLewistown, PA★★★★☆3/5
Greenwood Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing19.2 miLewistown, PA★★★☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in State College →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395756.