OklahomaHobart

Hobart Nursing & Rehabilitation

709 North Lowe, Hobart, OK 73651 · Kiowa County · 58 certified beds · avg 36 residents/day · certified since Sep 1, 1996

Part of chain: SOUTHWEST LTC (10 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$13,070
Fines, last 3 years
3.99
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jun 2, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jun 3, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (11)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 2, 2026▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jun 2, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint
Mar 5, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint
Mar 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Mar 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Mar 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure care was delivered by qualified people following each resident's written care plan — the individualized document that spells out exactly what care that resident is supposed to receive.
Mar 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Mar 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 9, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Feb 9, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offWhen a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care.
Feb 9, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Inspection trend by year

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202330E
202440D
202520E
202621J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $13,070.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jun 2, 2026Fine$13,070

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOklahoma avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.994.583.95bottom 18% in Oklahoma; top 40% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.500.410.69top 25% in Oklahoma; bottom 37% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.514.163.50bottom 17% in Oklahoma; top 41% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.280.280.48top 37% in Oklahoma; bottom 28% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)71.455.545.8bottom 13% in Oklahoma; bottom 5% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.053.642.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.11, RN 0.39, weekend 2.74. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Baronet, RodIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/01/2022
Brashier, CraigIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/01/2022
Payne, RonaldIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/01/2022
Quality Care Givers INCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/01/2022
Ronald R Payne PCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/01/2022
Southwest LTC Oklahoma Holdings, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest99%10/01/2022
Southwest LTC, LTDOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/01/2022
Payne, RonaldIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2022
Payne, RonaldIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2022
Southwest LTC Management Services, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Cordell Nursing and Rehabilitation19.6 miCordell, OK★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 1 closest →

All facilities in Hobart →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 375279.