NebraskaGothenburg

Hilltop Estates

2520 Avenue M, Gothenburg, NE 69138 · Dawson County · 64 certified beds · avg 41 residents/day · certified since Jul 2, 1995

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.61
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (15)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 16, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Jun 16, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 16, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
Jun 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Jun 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jun 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jun 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jun 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 18, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 18, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety.
Mar 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Mar 21, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 21, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 8).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202430F
202540F
202680F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNebraska avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.614.333.95top 37% in Nebraska; top 20% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.820.720.69top 33% in Nebraska; top 26% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.803.793.50top 44% in Nebraska; top 29% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.500.470.48top 35% in Nebraska; top 32% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)46.448.745.8top 49% in Nebraska; bottom 46% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)22.244.142.9top 23% in Nebraska; top 17% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.11, RN 0.73, weekend 3.38. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Bartruff, CraigIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest10/19/2009
K C Health Care Enterprises INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest02/15/1995
Bahe, ScottIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/15/1998
Bahe, ScottIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/15/1998
Bahe, ScottIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/15/1998
Bartruff, CraigIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/15/1995
Bartruff, CraigIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/15/1995
Donner, TiffanyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/11/2016
Donner, TiffanyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/11/2016
Family Physical Therapy & Sports CenterOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2021
Family Physical Therapy & Sports CenterOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/05/2025
Flatwater BankOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/1995
Flatwater BankOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/05/2025
K C Health Care Enterprises INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/15/1995
Key Rehabilitation INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Key Rehabilitation INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/24/2025
Luminate HCC LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
Luminate HCC LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/21/2025
Osborn, ShirleyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2019
Osborn, ShirleyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2019

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Emerald Nursing & Rehab Cozad9.9 miCozad, NE★☆☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 1 closest →

All facilities in Gothenburg →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 285163.