WashingtonGig Harbor

Heron's Key

4340 Borgen Blvd NW, Gig Harbor, WA 98332 · Pierce County · 30 certified beds · avg 16 residents/day · certified since Jan 31, 2018

5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$15,015
Fines, last 3 years
6.50
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Aug 31, 2023 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Sep 28, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (19)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 13, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Feb 13, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Feb 13, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents.
Nov 15, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not give residents the required written notice of their rights, the facility's rules, the services offered, and what those services cost.
Nov 15, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 15, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Nov 15, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Nov 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to share a room with their spouse or a roommate of their choosing, or moved residents to a different room without written notice beforehand.
Nov 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Nov 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Nov 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Nov 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Nov 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Nov 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Nov 15, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Jan 8, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Jan 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Jan 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Aug 31, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (12 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202311G ▲
2024150F
202630D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $15,015.

DateTypeAmount / length
Aug 31, 2023Fine$15,015

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityWashington avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)6.504.243.95top 3% in Washington; top 2% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.920.910.69top 2% in Washington; top 2% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing6.063.693.50top 3% in Washington; top 2% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)1.830.670.48top 1% in Washington; top 1% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)29.645.145.8top 12% in Washington; top 14% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)44.445.442.9bottom 49% in Washington; bottom 45% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.75, RN 1.70, weekend 5.36. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Herons KeyOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%01/10/2013
Antonucci, JamesIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2016
Antonucci, JamesIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2016
Ashley, JohnathanIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE10/17/2016
Chambard, AllanIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/13/2015
Emerald CommunitiesOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2015
Kilcup, LeroyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/16/2016
King, GaryIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/10/2013
Schneider, DaphneIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/10/2013
Vanhorn, DannaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/10/2013
Wallin, KayIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/13/2015

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Gig Harbor Health and Rehabilitation4.2 miGig Harbor, WA★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Cottesmore of Life Care5.4 miGig Harbor, WA★★★★☆3/5
Eliseo7.5 miTacoma, WA★★★☆☆2/5
Avamere Transitional Care of Puget Sound7.9 miTacoma, WA★★★★☆3/5
Park Rose Care Center9.3 miTacoma, WA★★☆☆☆2/5
Agility Health and Rehabilitation10.9 miUniversity Place, WA★★★☆☆3/5
Orchard Park Health Care & Rehab Center10.9 miTacoma, WA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Avamere Rehabilitation at Ridgemont11.2 miPort Orchard, WA★★★★☆4/5
Life Care Center of Port Orchard11.3 miPort Orchard, WA★★★★★4/5
Birch Creek Post Acute & Rehabilitation11.4 miTacoma, WA★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Gig Harbor →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 505531.