2102 South 96th Street, Tacoma, WA 98444 (opens Google Maps) · Pierce County · (253) 581-2514· 150 certified beds · avg 104 residents/day · certified since Mar 1, 1983 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Mar 6, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Apr 17, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 19 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. F-0803
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| Jun 22, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jun 22, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jun 22, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Jun 22, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. · F-0791 |
| Jun 22, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jun 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Jun 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Mar 28, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Mar 28, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · F-0806 |
| Mar 28, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921 |
| Mar 28, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Mar 28, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Mar 28, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Mar 28, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Mar 28, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| Mar 6, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Mar 6, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint · F-0607 |
| Mar 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 6 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $36,446.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2024 | Fine | $36,446 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Washington avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.76 | 4.24 | 3.95 | bottom 31% in Washington; bottom 50% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.46 | 0.91 | 0.69 | bottom 1% in Washington; bottom 32% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.35 | 3.69 | 3.50 | bottom 41% in Washington; bottom 50% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.48 | top 50% in Washington; top 20% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 45.9 | 45.1 | 45.8 | bottom 44% in Washington; bottom 47% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 40.0 | 45.4 | 42.9 | top 42% in Washington; top 46% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.89, RN 0.60, weekend 4.35.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.89 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Tacoma Nursing and Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S&r Weiss Revocable Trust Uad December 23, 1993 | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Weiss, Jonah | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Weiss, Rebecca | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Weiss, Rebecca | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 50% | 01/01/2019 |
| Weiss, Steven | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 50% | 01/01/2019 |
| Benjamin, Sabrina | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/20/2020 |
| Benjamin, Sabrina | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/20/2020 |
| Diaz, Damen | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/12/2021 |
| Diaz, Damen | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/12/2021 |
| Hansen Hunter LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Highland Wellnesscare LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| S&r Weiss Revocable Trust Uad December 23, 1993 | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| S&r Weiss Revocable Trust Uad December 23, 1993 | Organization | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Weiss, Jonah | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Weiss, Jonah | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Weiss, Rebecca | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Weiss, Rebecca | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Weiss, Rebecca | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Weiss, Steven | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Weiss, Steven | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
Showing 20 of 21 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 1 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avalon Healthcare - Tacoma | 1.4 mi | Tacoma, WA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Heartwood Extended Healthcare | 2.0 mi | Tacoma, WA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Alaska Gardens Health and Rehabilitation | 2.3 mi | Tacoma, WA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Oaks at Lakewood | 3.0 mi | Tacoma, WA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Birch Creek Post Acute & Rehabilitation | 3.8 mi | Tacoma, WA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Avamere at Pacific Ridge | 3.9 mi | Tacoma, WA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Orchard Park Health Care & Rehab Center | 4.1 mi | Tacoma, WA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Agility Health and Rehabilitation | 4.9 mi | University Place, WA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Park Rose Care Center | 5.5 mi | Tacoma, WA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Avamere Transitional Care of Puget Sound | 7.0 mi | Tacoma, WA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Puyallup Post Acute | 7.0 mi | Puyallup, WA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Life Care Center of South Hill | 7.0 mi | Puyallup, WA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Pierce, WA — 21 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 505154.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details