Tacoma Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
2102 South 96th Street, Tacoma, WA 98444 · Pierce County · 150 certified beds · avg 104 residents/day · certified since Mar 1, 1983
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 6, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Apr 17, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (19)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2026 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. |
| Jun 22, 2026 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Jun 22, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Jun 22, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. |
| Jun 22, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. |
| Jun 22, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Jun 20, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Jun 20, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint |
| Mar 28, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Mar 28, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. |
| Mar 28, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. |
| Mar 28, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Mar 28, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. |
| Mar 28, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. |
| Mar 28, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. |
| Mar 28, 2024 | B · Minimal risk, repeated | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. |
| Mar 6, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Mar 6, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint |
| Mar 6, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint |
Inspection trend by year
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 6 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
1 fine totaling $36,446.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2024 | Fine | $36,446 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Washington avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.76 | 4.24 | 3.95 | bottom 31% in Washington; bottom 50% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.46 | 0.91 | 0.69 | bottom 1% in Washington; bottom 32% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.35 | 3.69 | 3.50 | bottom 41% in Washington; bottom 50% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.48 | top 50% in Washington; top 20% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 45.9 | 45.1 | 45.8 | bottom 44% in Washington; bottom 47% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 40.0 | 45.4 | 42.9 | top 42% in Washington; top 46% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.89, RN 0.60, weekend 4.35. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S&r Weiss Revocable Trust Uad December 23, 1993 | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Weiss, Jonah | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Weiss, Rebecca | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Weiss, Rebecca | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 50% | 01/01/2019 |
| Weiss, Steven | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 50% | 01/01/2019 |
| Benjamin, Sabrina | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/20/2020 |
| Benjamin, Sabrina | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/20/2020 |
| Diaz, Damen | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/12/2021 |
| Diaz, Damen | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/12/2021 |
| Hansen Hunter LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Highland Wellnesscare LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| S&r Weiss Revocable Trust Uad December 23, 1993 | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| S&r Weiss Revocable Trust Uad December 23, 1993 | Organization | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Weiss, Jonah | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Weiss, Jonah | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Weiss, Rebecca | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Weiss, Rebecca | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Weiss, Rebecca | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Weiss, Steven | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Weiss, Steven | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "Who reviews your menus, and can I see this week's menu and join my family member for a meal?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "How do residents get dental care here — is there a dentist who visits, and how are appointments arranged?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avalon Healthcare - Tacoma | 1.4 mi | Tacoma, WA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Heartwood Extended Healthcare | 2.1 mi | Tacoma, WA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Alaska Gardens Health and Rehabilitation | 2.3 mi | Tacoma, WA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Oaks at Lakewood | 3.0 mi | Tacoma, WA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Birch Creek Post Acute & Rehabilitation | 3.8 mi | Tacoma, WA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Avamere at Pacific Ridge | 3.9 mi | Tacoma, WA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Orchard Park Health Care & Rehab Center | 4.1 mi | Tacoma, WA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Agility Health and Rehabilitation | 4.9 mi | University Place, WA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Park Rose Care Center | 5.5 mi | Tacoma, WA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Avamere Transitional Care of Puget Sound | 7.0 mi | Tacoma, WA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 505154.