Heritage House at Keller Rehab & Nursing
1150 Whitley Road, Keller, TX 76248 · Tarrant County · 120 certified beds · avg 113 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1993
Part of chain: ADVANCED HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS (28 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Nov 19, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Oct 24, 2023 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.
Corrected: Sep 30, 2023 (Past Non-Compliance)
All citations in the current public record (20)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint |
| Dec 3, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. |
| Dec 3, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. |
| Dec 3, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Nov 19, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Feb 20, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · from a complaint |
| Feb 20, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint |
| Nov 13, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Oct 24, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint |
| Oct 24, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint |
| Aug 29, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint |
| Aug 29, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| Mar 19, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · from a complaint |
| Oct 24, 2023 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Jul 20, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Jul 20, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility's bedrooms did not give residents visual privacy — such as curtains or dividers — when privacy is needed. |
| Jul 20, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. |
| Jul 20, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. |
| Jul 20, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Jul 20, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 3).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 7 | 1 | J ▲ |
| 2024 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 6 | 1 | J ▲ |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
2 fines totaling $22,608.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2025 | Fine | $15,162 |
| Oct 24, 2023 | Fine | $7,446 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Texas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.03 | 3.46 | 3.95 | bottom 25% in Texas; bottom 15% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.59 | 0.44 | 0.69 | top 16% in Texas; top 50% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.69 | 3.04 | 3.50 | bottom 29% in Texas; bottom 16% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.40 | 0.34 | 0.48 | top 26% in Texas; top 48% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 45.3 | 55.3 | 45.8 | top 34% in Texas; bottom 49% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 47.4 | 54.6 | 42.9 | top 41% in Texas; bottom 40% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.18, RN 0.62, weekend 2.83. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Who owns this facility
Government - Hospital district
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Palo Pinto County Hospital District | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 10/01/2014 |
| Advanced HCS LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2014 |
| Korkmas, Ross | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/06/2019 |
| Korkmas, Ross | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/06/2019 |
| Lichtschein, Teddy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| Meisner, Michael | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| Scheiner, Eliezer | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "If my family member is able to manage their own medications, would you allow it, and how is that decided?"
- "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "Who on your staff manages IV therapy, and what training and monitoring is in place?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Harrison at Heritage | 2.0 mi | Fort Worth, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - Fort W | 2.6 mi | Keller, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Green Valley Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center | 2.9 mi | Fort Worth, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| North Pointe Nursing and Rehabilitation | 3.4 mi | Watauga, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Discovery Village at Southlake | 3.7 mi | Southlake, TX | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Keller Oaks Healthcare Center | 3.8 mi | Keller, TX | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| The Carlyle at Stonebridge Park | 4.2 mi | Southlake, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Avir at Emerald Hills | 4.9 mi | North Richland Hills, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Oakmont Guest Care Center | 5.4 mi | Hurst, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Glenview Wellness & Rehabilitation | 6.5 mi | North Richland Hills, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 675153.