How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Heritage Health-Hoopeston
423 North Dixie Highway, Hoopeston, IL 60942 (opens Google Maps) · Vermilion County · (217) 283-8247· 75 certified beds · avg 71 residents/day · certified since Jan 25, 1983 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: HERITAGE OPERATIONS GROUP (9 facilities, chain avg rating 2.0★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected May 21, 2026
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Apr 28, 2026
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.55
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Apr 28, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Apr 28, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: May 21, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 24 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. F-0695
The facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings. F-0557
The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. F-0637
View all 24 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| May 21, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings. · F-0557 |
| May 21, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · F-0637 |
| May 21, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| May 21, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. · F-0881 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Feb 4, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Feb 4, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint · F-0657 |
| Jul 30, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Mar 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580 |
| Mar 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Mar 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Mar 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jun 5, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jun 5, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · F-0604 |
| Jun 5, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Jun 5, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jun 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Jun 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Jun 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jun 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. · F-0699 |
| Jun 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 12, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
| May 12, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 5).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 1
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 9 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 5 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 8 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityIllinois averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 2.55
Illinois average: 2.99
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.64
Illinois average: 0.63
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.27
Illinois average: 2.67
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Illinois avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.55 | 2.99 | 3.95 | bottom 40% in Illinois; bottom 4% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.69 | top 33% in Illinois; top 43% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.27 | 2.67 | 3.50 | bottom 40% in Illinois; bottom 5% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.40 | 0.56 | 0.48 | bottom 39% in Illinois; top 48% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 29.5 | 44.5 | 45.8 | top 14% in Illinois; top 13% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 18.2 | 41.8 | 42.9 | top 14% in Illinois; top 12% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.97, RN 0.74, weekend 2.64.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (2.97 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Heritage Health-Hoopeston. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brown, Paige | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/08/2022 |
| Brown, Paige | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/08/2022 |
| Brown, Paige | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/08/2022 |
| Curry, Daniel | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/04/2022 |
| Curry, Daniel | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/07/2025 |
| Gress, Loni | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2024 |
| Hart, Benjamin | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/05/2014 |
| Hart, Steven | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Heritage Operations Group, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/22/2022 |
| Heritage Operations Group, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/17/2025 |
| Lounsbury, Karla | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| McFadden, Dave | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/24/2022 |
| Nicholls, William | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/24/2022 |
| Ray, Darrin | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/21/2021 |
| Ray, Darrin | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/21/2021 |
| Ray, Darrin | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/09/2025 |
| Totheroh, Brandi | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2022 |
| Tucker, Heather | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/11/2022 |
| Wilson, Connie | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/24/2022 |
All 19 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Heritage Operations Group — 9 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Mason City Area Nursing Home — Mason City, IL · overall 1/5
- Odd Fellow-Rebekah Home — Mattoon, IL · overall 1/5abuse
- Regency Care — Springfield, IL · overall 1/5
- St Clara's Rehab & Senior Care — Lincoln, IL · overall 2/5
- Sunny Acres Nursing Home — Petersburg, IL · overall 1/5abuse
- Villa Health Care East — Sherman, IL · overall 1/5
- Country Health — Gifford, IL · overall 2/5abuse
- H & J Vonderlieth LVG Ctr, the — Mount Pulaski, IL · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
- "How do you train staff to treat residents with dignity, and how do you protect residents' personal belongings?"
- "If my family member's health suddenly changes, how quickly do you reassess them and update their care?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "Who oversees antibiotic use here, and how do you decide when an antibiotic is really needed?"
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Illinois midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 30% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 19 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iroquois Resident Home, the | 20.5 mi | Watseka, IL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Hawthorne Inn of Danville | 20.6 mi | Danville, IL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Country Health | 20.8 mi | Gifford, IL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Accolade HC of Paxton on Pells | 20.8 mi | Paxton, IL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Accolade Paxton Senior Living | 21.4 mi | Paxton, IL | ★★★★☆ | 5/5 | |
| Arcadia Care Watseka | 21.7 mi | Watseka, IL | —/5 | abuseSFF | |
| La Bella of Danville | 22.3 mi | Danville, IL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Accolade Healthcare Danville | 23.2 mi | Danville, IL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Williamsport Nursing and Rehabilitation | 23.7 mi | Williamsport, IN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Goldwater Care Danville | 23.9 mi | Danville, IL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Gilman Healthcare Center | 25.0 mi | Gilman, IL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Waters of Covington, the | 28.1 mi | Covington, IN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 145470.