CaliforniaHemet

Hemet Valley Healthcare Center

371 North Weston Pl, Hemet, CA 92543 · Riverside County · 113 certified beds · avg 18 residents/day · certified since Feb 24, 1995

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$51,489
Fines, last 3 years
5.08
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Feb 25, 2025 · F-0880 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Why it matters: Weak infection control lets illnesses like flu, COVID-19, and drug-resistant infections spread quickly among vulnerable residents.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Mar 21, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 18, 2024 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 16, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (23)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 21, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Feb 25, 2025▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Feb 25, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Feb 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Jul 31, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records.
Jul 31, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jul 31, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Jul 31, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 31, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jul 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Jul 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Jul 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Apr 18, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Apr 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jun 27, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 27, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Jun 27, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jun 27, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jun 27, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide each resident with a nourishing, tasty, well-balanced diet that meets their daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
Jun 27, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 2).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202260F
2024111G ▲
202561K ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $51,489.

DateTypeAmount / length
Feb 25, 2025Fine$51,489

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityCalifornia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.084.313.95top 13% in California; top 12% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.250.610.69top 6% in California; top 8% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.433.903.50top 16% in California; top 13% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)2.260.510.48top 2% in California; top 1% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)51.236.745.8bottom 12% in California; bottom 34% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)55.638.142.9bottom 20% in California; bottom 28% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 10.96, RN 2.70, weekend 9.55. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Physician for Healthy Hospitals LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest44%09/15/2010
Thomas, WilliamIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest6%04/23/2013
William E Thomas Profit Sharing Plan and TrustOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest6%04/23/2013
Agarwal, AshokIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/15/2010
Agarwal, AshokIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/13/2010
Chaudhuri, KaliIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/15/2010
Chaudhuri, KaliIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/13/2010
Collins, JohnIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE08/23/2016
Collins, JohnIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/13/2010
Gupta, NeelamIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/13/2010
Gupta, NeelamIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/13/2010
Gupta, RakeshIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/15/2010
Gupta, RakeshIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/13/2010
Hughes, LarryIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/13/2010
Hughes, LarryIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/13/2010
Kolli, HemchandIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/15/2010
Kolli, HemchandIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/13/2010
McLaughlin, DanIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE08/23/2016
Nakka, SreenivasaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/15/2010
Nakka, SreenivasaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/29/2011

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Devonshire Care Center0.1 miHemet, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5
San Jacinto Valley Post Acute0.1 miHemet, CA★★★★★4/5
Meadowbrook Post Acute1.5 miHemet, CA★★☆☆☆2/5
Ramona Rehabilitation and Post Acute Care Center1.8 miHemet, CA★★★☆☆3/5
The Bradley Gardens2.2 miSan Jacinto, CA★★★☆☆3/5
Hemet Hills Post Acute2.4 miHemet, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5
The Village Healthcare Center2.4 miHemet, CA★★★★☆3/5
Vista Real Post Acute12.5 miBeaumont, CA★★★★☆3/5
Sundance Creek Post Acute12.5 miBanning, CA★★☆☆☆2/5
Sunrise Post Acute12.8 miBanning, CA★★☆☆☆1/5
Menifee Lakes Post Acute13.4 miSun City, CA★★★☆☆2/5
Highland Springs Care Center13.5 miBeaumont, CA★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Hemet →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555623.