Glasgow Gardens

Name: Glasgow Gardens
Address: 100 AUDSLEY DRIVE, Glasgow, MO, 65254, US
Telephone: 6603382297

100 Audsley Drive, Glasgow, MO 65254 · Howard County · 59 certified beds · avg 38 residents/day · certified since Jun 23, 1993

Part of chain: JAMES & JUDY LINCOLN (56 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)

4/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

3.09

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (16)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Apr 17, 2025	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
Apr 17, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 17, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Apr 17, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Apr 17, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 17, 2025	B · Minimal risk, repeated	When a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care.
Aug 23, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Aug 23, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames.
Aug 23, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Aug 23, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Aug 23, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jan 16, 2020	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jan 16, 2020	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Jan 16, 2020	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Jan 16, 2020	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 16, 2020	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 6).

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2020	5	E
2023	5	E
2025	6	F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Missouri avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.09	3.66	3.95	bottom 26% in Missouri; bottom 17% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.37	0.49	0.69	bottom 40% in Missouri; bottom 18% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	2.73	3.22	3.50	bottom 28% in Missouri; bottom 18% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.31	0.33	0.48	top 40% in Missouri; bottom 34% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	44.0	56.0	45.8	top 21% in Missouri; top 47% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	0.0	47.8	42.9	—

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.52, RN 0.30, weekend 2.23. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Lincoln, James	Individual	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	50%	09/01/2016
Lincoln, Judy	Individual	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	50%	09/01/2016
Crowder, Tabitha	Individual	W-2 Managing Employee	NOT APPLICABLE	12/16/2021
LTC Management Services LLC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	09/01/2016

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"How many hours a day is a registered nurse physically in the building, including weekends?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"Who oversees antibiotic use here, and how do you decide when an antibiotic is really needed?"
"What percentage of your residents and staff are vaccinated against flu and pneumonia, and how do you offer the vaccines?"
"Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
"What exactly do you hand off to the next provider when a resident is discharged, and how do you confirm they received it?"
"What alternatives do you try before using bed rails, and how do you involve families in that decision?"
"How often are beds and bed rails inspected, and who does those checks?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Chariton Park Health Care Center	12.6 mi	Salisbury, MO	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuseSFF
Riverdell Care Center	19.5 mi	Boonville, MO	★★☆☆☆	4/5

Compare this facility with the 2 closest →

All facilities in Glasgow →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265535.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Glasgow Gardens

100 Audsley Drive, Glasgow, MO 65254 · 6603382297

Health inspection rating 4/5 · CMS overall 3/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "How many hours a day is a registered nurse physically in the building, including weekends?"
☐ "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
☐ "Who oversees antibiotic use here, and how do you decide when an antibiotic is really needed?"
☐ "What percentage of your residents and staff are vaccinated against flu and pneumonia, and how do you offer the vaccines?"
☐ "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
☐ "What exactly do you hand off to the next provider when a resident is discharged, and how do you confirm they received it?"
☐ "What alternatives do you try before using bed rails, and how do you involve families in that decision?"
☐ "How often are beds and bed rails inspected, and who does those checks?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 265535 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)