Illinois ›Breese

Evercare of Breese

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

1155 North First Street, Breese, IL 62230 (opens Google Maps) · Clinton County · (618) 526-4521· 112 certified beds · avg 79 residents/day · certified since Mar 1, 1982 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: EVERCARE SKILLED NURSING (8 facilities, chain avg rating 1.1★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jan 31, 2025
5
Serious findings on record
most recent Oct 16, 2025
$164,735
Fines, last 3 years
2.27
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Jan 31, 2025 · F-0686

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Feb 17, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · Oct 16, 2025 · F-0880 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Why it matters: Weak infection control lets illnesses like flu, COVID-19, and drug-resistant infections spread quickly among vulnerable residents.

Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Oct 25, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · May 20, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Jun 13, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · Oct 16, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Nov 5, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · Feb 2, 2024 · F-0697 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.

Why it matters: Untreated pain causes needless suffering and can lead to depression, poor sleep, and declining health.

Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Feb 3, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 13 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. G · Actual harm, isolated

    The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint F-0880

  2. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint F-0583

  3. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint F-0755

View all 13 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Oct 16, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, isolatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880
Sep 18, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint · F-0583
Sep 18, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755
Jul 7, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584
May 20, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689
Jan 31, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686
Jan 31, 2025F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespreadThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · F-0727
Oct 16, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689
Jul 18, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880
Feb 2, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0697
Nov 17, 2022E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690
Nov 17, 2022D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558
Nov 17, 2022D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880

Inspection trend by year

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 2
2025
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 3

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202230E
202432G ▲
202573J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

5 fines totaling $164,735, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.

DateTypeAmount / length
Apr 17, 2026Fine$29,100
Oct 16, 2025Fine$24,252
May 20, 2025Fine$12,674
May 20, 2025Payment Denial2 days from Jun 11, 2025
Jan 31, 2025Fine$87,877
Oct 16, 2024Fine$10,832

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityIllinois averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 2.27
Illinois average: 2.99
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.27
Illinois average: 0.63
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.03
Illinois average: 2.67
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityIllinois avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.272.993.95bottom 20% in Illinois; bottom 2% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.270.630.69bottom 12% in Illinois; bottom 7% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.032.673.50bottom 22% in Illinois; bottom 2% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.240.560.48bottom 13% in Illinois; bottom 20% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)—44.545.8—
RN turnover (%)—41.842.9—

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.70, RN 0.32, weekend 2.42.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (2.70 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Evercare of Breese. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Eu SNF Holdings LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/11/2025
Eu SNF Holdings LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/11/2025
Hellman, YosefIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/11/2025
Hoffman, JoshuaIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/11/2025
RKS Holdings LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/11/2025
RKS Manager LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/11/2025
Rosenblatt, YehudaIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/11/2025
Seitler, DovidIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/11/2025
Weinberger, ShmuelIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/11/2025
Flick, JohnIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/11/2025
Flick, JohnIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/11/2025
Hults, AshleyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/11/2025
Hults, AshleyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/11/2025
Kinnard, StephanieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/11/2025
Kinnard, StephanieIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/11/2025
Seitler, DovidIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/11/2025
Weinberger, ShmuelIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE06/11/2025
Weinberger, ShmuelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/11/2025
Weinberger, ShmuelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/11/2025

All 19 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Evercare Skilled Nursing — 8 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
  • "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
  • "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
  • "How do you assess and manage residents' pain, especially for those who have trouble communicating?"
  • "How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
  • "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
  • "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
  • "How many hours a day is a registered nurse physically in the building, including weekends?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Illinois midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 19 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Aviston Countryside Manor4.4 miAviston, IL★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Carlyle Healthcare & Sr Living8.4 miCarlyle, IL★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
Clinton Manor Living Center10.9 miNew Baden, IL★★★★★5/5
Highland Health Care Center11.6 miHighland, IL★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
Cedar Ridge Health & Rehab Ctr15.8 miLebanon, IL★★★☆☆4/5
Evercare of Lebanon15.9 miLebanon, IL★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
Nexus at Mascoutah17.5 miMascoutah, IL★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
La Bella of Mascoutah17.8 miMascoutah, IL★☆☆☆☆2/5
Greenville Nursing & Rehab19.5 miGreenville, IL★★★★☆4/5
Axiom Gardens of Nashville19.7 miNashville, IL★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Breese →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 145410.

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details