NebraskaBlair

Crowell Memorial Home

245 South 22nd Street, Blair, NE 68008 · Washington County · 74 certified beds · avg 67 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1997

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.80
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 18, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 23, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Dec 14, 2023 · F-0760 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.

Why it matters: A serious medication error can cause real harm, hospitalization, or worse.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Dec 5, 2023 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (28)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 18, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Feb 18, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Sep 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Aug 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Jun 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Jun 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jun 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Jun 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Jun 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · from a complaint
Apr 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint
Apr 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Apr 16, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 16, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Apr 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · from a complaint
Apr 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Apr 16, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
Dec 14, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Dec 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Apr 20, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Apr 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Apr 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Apr 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Apr 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Apr 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Apr 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023111G ▲
202450F
2025100D
202621G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

0 fines totaling $0, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Feb 18, 2026Payment Denial6 days from Mar 17, 2026

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNebraska avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.804.333.95bottom 31% in Nebraska; top 49% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.610.720.69bottom 39% in Nebraska; top 47% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.443.793.50bottom 36% in Nebraska; top 45% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.610.470.48top 23% in Nebraska; top 22% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)90.548.745.8bottom 1% in Nebraska; bottom 1% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)90.944.142.9bottom 2% in Nebraska; bottom 2% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.11, RN 0.66, weekend 3.72. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Anderson, DougIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2017
Anderson, DougIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2017
Benner, StacyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2017
Benner, StacyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2017
Rolland, JaclynIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE12/04/2017
Rolland, JaclynIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE12/04/2017
Rolland, JaclynIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/04/2017
Rolland, JaclynIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/04/2017

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Good Shepherd Lutheran Home0.5 miBlair, NE★☆☆☆☆1/5
Azria Health Longview13.7 miMissouri Valley, IA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Accura Healthcare of Tekamah16.6 miTekamah, NE★☆☆☆☆2/5
Quality Living, INC.17.0 miOmaha, NE★★★☆☆3/5
Life Care Center of Omaha17.4 miOmaha, NE★☆☆☆☆1/5
Florence Home17.5 miOmaha, NE★★★★☆3/5
Emerald Nursing & Rehab Legacy Pointe LLC17.8 miOmaha, NE★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Keystone Ridge Post Acute Nursing and Rehabilitati17.9 miOmaha, NE★★☆☆☆1/5
Nye Pointe Health & Rehab Ctr17.9 miFremont, NE★★★☆☆4/5
Life Care Center of Elkhorn18.1 miElkhorn, NE★☆☆☆☆1/5
Old Mill Rehabilitation18.6 miOmaha, NE★★★☆☆3/5
Nye Legacy Health & Rehabilitation Center18.7 miFremont, NE★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Blair →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 285210.