IowaWest Branch

Crestview Specialty Care

451 West Orange Street, West Branch, IA 52358 · Cedar County · 65 certified beds · avg 48 residents/day · certified since Sep 1, 1996 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: CARE INITIATIVES (43 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
6
Serious findings on record
$216,061
Fines, last 3 years
4.21
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Dec 3, 2025 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Dec 23, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Dec 3, 2025 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Dec 23, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Dec 3, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Dec 23, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Nov 21, 2024 · F-0686

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Dec 10, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Sep 4, 2024 · F-0658 · triggered by a complaint

The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.

Why it matters: Care that falls below professional standards can directly harm a resident's health and recovery.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Sep 16, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 9, 2024 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jun 4, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (28)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 3, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Dec 3, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Dec 3, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Dec 3, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Dec 3, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Dec 3, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Dec 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · from a complaint
Dec 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Dec 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required.
Dec 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Dec 3, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Dec 3, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them.
Nov 21, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Nov 21, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Nov 21, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 21, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program.
Nov 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Sep 4, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Sep 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings. · from a complaint
May 9, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Feb 1, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Feb 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Feb 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Nov 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Nov 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Nov 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Nov 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 13).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202340D
2024113G ▲
2025133J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

3 fines totaling $216,061.

DateTypeAmount / length
Dec 3, 2025Fine$184,438
Nov 21, 2024Fine$19,877
Sep 4, 2024Fine$11,746

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityIowa avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.214.373.95bottom 49% in Iowa; top 32% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.930.850.69top 33% in Iowa; top 19% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.753.863.50bottom 49% in Iowa; top 31% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.630.510.48top 22% in Iowa; top 20% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)62.744.045.8bottom 9% in Iowa; bottom 13% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)77.842.142.9bottom 10% in Iowa; bottom 7% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.67, RN 0.81, weekend 3.27. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Care InitiativesOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%09/01/2011
Baedke, CharissaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Beal, MichaelIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2020
Beal, MichaelIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2020
Beal, MichaelIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/11/2025
Bowen, LaneIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Branscomb, TysonIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/03/2025
Branscomb, TysonIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/10/2025
Carothers, Mary JaneIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Childs, KevinIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
Computershare Corporate Trust Company, NaOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2025
Computershare Corporate Trust Company, NaOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/10/2025
Corless, PeterIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Dixon, DavidIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2016
Drake, EmilyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/04/2023
Eberly, ScottIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Eberly, ScottIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/28/2025
Gilyard, TanyaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/23/2025
Krein, KeithIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/29/2022
Kuhn, JeramyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/25/2008

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Iowa City Rehab & Health Care6.8 miIowa City, IA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Simpson Memorial Home8.2 miWest Liberty, IA★★★☆☆4/5
Briarwood Healthcare Center10.2 miIowa City, IA★★★★★4/5
Oaknoll Retirement Residence10.7 miIowa City, IA★★★★★5/5
Solon Nursing Care Center11.4 miSolon, IA★★★★★5/5
Lantern Park Specialty Care12.8 miCoralville, IA★★☆☆☆2/5
Cedar Manor Nursing Home13.7 miTipton, IA★★★☆☆3/5
Lone Tree Health Care Center INC13.8 miLone Tree, IA★★★★★4/5
Windmill Manor14.1 miCoralville, IA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Mechanicsville Specialty Care16.9 miMechanicsville, IA★★★★★4/5
Hallmark Care Center17.1 miMount Vernon, IA★★☆☆☆2/5
Rehabilitation Center of Lisbon17.3 miLisbon, IA★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in West Branch →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 165287.