How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
15823 So. Western Ave., Gardena, CA 90247 (opens Google Maps) · Los Angeles County · (310) 538-2323· 99 certified beds · avg 96 residents/day · certified since Feb 9, 2013 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 13 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656
The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint F-0609
The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. F-0641
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Feb 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Feb 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Feb 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Feb 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. · F-0699 |
| Feb 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · F-0726 |
| Jan 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Feb 23, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Feb 23, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Feb 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Feb 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Feb 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs. · F-0770 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 1).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 6 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | California avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.50 | 4.31 | 3.95 | top 8% in California; top 7% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.41 | 0.61 | 0.69 | bottom 34% in California; bottom 23% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 5.19 | 3.90 | 3.50 | top 5% in California; top 5% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.23 | 0.51 | 0.48 | bottom 17% in California; bottom 17% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 22.0 | 36.7 | 45.8 | top 11% in California; top 4% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 28.6 | 38.1 | 42.9 | top 33% in California; top 26% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.03, RN 0.30, weekend 3.81.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.03 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Clear View Convalescent Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Towns, Jeffrey | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 50% | 06/11/2012 |
| Towns, Mark | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 50% | 06/11/2012 |
| Arora, Nidhi | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/11/2014 |
| Arora, Nidhi | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/11/2014 |
| Badillo, Jose | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/05/1981 |
| Badillo, Jose | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/05/1981 |
| Cerna, Lucrecia | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/25/1988 |
| Cerna, Lucrecia | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/25/1988 |
| Grijalva, Mauricio | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/18/1998 |
| Grijalva, Mauricio | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/18/1998 |
| Kooner, Sandeep | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/1999 |
| Kooner, Sandeep | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/1999 |
| Martinez, Juliet | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/21/2017 |
| Martinez, Juliet | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/21/2017 |
| Morris, Michelle | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2005 |
| Morris, Michelle | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2005 |
| Sum, Sotheavy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2010 |
| Sum, Sotheavy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2010 |
| Towns, Jeffrey | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/11/2012 |
| Towns, Jeffrey | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/11/2012 |
Showing 20 of 28 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 8 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clear View Sanitarium | 0.0 mi | Gardena, CA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Memorial Hospital of Gardena D/P SNF | 0.3 mi | Gardena, CA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Kei-Ai South Bay Healthcare Center | 0.7 mi | Gardena, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Gardena Convalescent Center | 0.8 mi | Gardena, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Rosecrans Care Center | 1.1 mi | Gardena, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| West Gardena Post Acute | 1.2 mi | Gardena, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Las Flores Convalescent Hospital | 1.5 mi | Gardena, CA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Camino Healthcare | 2.1 mi | Hawthorne, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Lawndale Healthcare & Wellness Centre LLC | 2.3 mi | Lawndale, CA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| View Heights Conv Hosp | 2.7 mi | Los Angeles, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Avalon Villa Care Center | 3.0 mi | Los Angeles, CA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Heritage Rehabilitation Center | 3.8 mi | Torrance, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Los Angeles, CA — 369 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555880.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details