How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Cedar Ridge Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
1700 N Washington St, Pilot Point, TX 76258 (opens Google Maps) · Denton County · (940) 686-5556· 108 certified beds · avg 82 residents/day · certified since Jul 18, 1991 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: NEXION HEALTH (51 facilities, chain avg rating 2.2★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Apr 1, 2026
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.71
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 34 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint F-0558
The facility's activities program was not run by a qualified professional. The person directing recreation and social activities must have proper training or credentials. F-0680
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761
View all 34 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint · F-0558 |
| Apr 1, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's activities program was not run by a qualified professional. The person directing recreation and social activities must have proper training or credentials. · F-0680 |
| Apr 1, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Apr 1, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Apr 1, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Apr 1, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Apr 1, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Apr 1, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Apr 1, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Nov 25, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0695 |
| Jun 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Apr 30, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Jan 16, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint · F-0558 |
| Jan 16, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Jan 16, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · F-0604 |
| Jan 16, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Jan 16, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0695 |
| Jan 16, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jan 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jan 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Dec 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint · F-0583 |
| Dec 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761 |
| Dec 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Nov 30, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. · F-0801 |
| Nov 30, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Nov 30, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Nov 30, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. · from a complaint · F-0849 |
| Nov 30, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Nov 30, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Nov 30, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Nov 30, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · from a complaint · F-0692 |
| Sep 14, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Sep 14, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint · F-0690 |
| Sep 14, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (8 → 9).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 11
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 11
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 11 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 11 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 9 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityTexas averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.71
Texas average: 3.46
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.31
Texas average: 0.44
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.52
Texas average: 3.04
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Texas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.71 | 3.46 | 3.95 | top 24% in Texas; bottom 47% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.31 | 0.44 | 0.69 | bottom 31% in Texas; bottom 10% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.52 | 3.04 | 3.50 | top 16% in Texas; top 41% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.17 | 0.34 | 0.48 | bottom 14% in Texas; bottom 8% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 49.5 | 55.3 | 45.8 | top 43% in Texas; bottom 38% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 71.4 | 54.6 | 42.9 | bottom 28% in Texas; bottom 11% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.57, RN 0.30, weekend 3.39.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.57 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Cedar Ridge Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bolt, Bretton | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 10/08/2020 |
| Kirley, Francis | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 10/08/2020 |
| Nexion Health Leasing, INC. | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 10/08/2020 |
| Nexion Health of Ohi INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 10/08/2020 |
| Nexion Health, INC. | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 10/08/2020 |
| Fallon, John | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/08/2020 |
| Herdrich, William | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/08/2020 |
| Kirley, Francis | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/08/2020 |
| Kirley, Francis | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/08/2020 |
| Kirley, Francis | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2020 |
| Lee, Brian | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/08/2020 |
| Nexion Health Leasing, INC. | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2020 |
| Nexion Health of Ohi INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2020 |
| Nexion Health, INC. | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2020 |
| Reid, John | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/08/2020 |
| Riner, Meera | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/08/2020 |
| Riner, Meera | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/08/2020 |
| Riner, Meera | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2020 |
| Rowan, Terry | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2020 |
All 19 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Nexion Health — 51 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Coleman Healthcare Center — Coleman, TX · overall 4/5
- Cross Timbers Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Flower Mound, TX · overall 3/5
- Duncanville Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center — Duncanville, TX · overall 1/5
- Flatonia Healthcare Center — Flatonia, TX · overall 1/5abuse
- Golden Creek Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center — Navasota, TX · overall 3/5
- Green Valley Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center — Fort Worth, TX · overall 1/5
- Gulf Shores Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Falfurrias, TX · overall 4/5
- Lakeview Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Winnsboro, TX · overall 3/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 50 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
- "Who runs your activities program, what are their qualifications, and can I see this week's activity calendar?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 50% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 19 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 14 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avir at Pilot Point | 1.3 mi | Pilot Point, TX | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Settlers Ridge Care Center | 11.3 mi | Celina, TX | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Whitesboro Health and Rehabilitation Center | 16.6 mi | Whitesboro, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Cottonwood Nursing & Rehabilitation | 16.7 mi | Denton, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Denton Village by Purehealth | 16.8 mi | Denton, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Renaissance Care Center | 17.8 mi | Gainesville, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Pecan Tree Rehab and Healthcare Center | 18.0 mi | Gainesville, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| University Rehabilitation Center | 18.1 mi | Denton, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Prairie Estates | 18.3 mi | Frisco, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Vintage Health Care Center | 18.6 mi | Denton, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Avir at Gainesville | 18.6 mi | Gainesville, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Corinth Rehabilitation Suites on the Parkway | 19.1 mi | Corinth, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Denton, TX — 18 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Cross Timbers Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Flower Mound, TX · overall 3/5
- Denton Rehabilitation and Nursing Center — Denton, TX · overall 4/5
- Hollymead — Flower Mound, TX · overall 3/5
- Lake Forest Village by Purehealth — Denton, TX · overall 4/5
- Lake Village Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Lewisville, TX · overall 1/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 455930.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).