CaliforniaSanta Monica

Brentwood Health Care Center

1321 Franklin Street, Santa Monica, CA 90404 · Los Angeles County · 59 certified beds · avg 57 residents/day · certified since May 1, 1980

Part of chain: NAHS (12 facilities, chain avg rating 4.0★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.29
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (46)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 21, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jan 23, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Jan 23, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint
Dec 4, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Mar 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not help residents with transportation to and from laboratory services outside the facility. · from a complaint
Oct 18, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Oct 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Oct 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Oct 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Oct 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Oct 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
Oct 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Oct 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Oct 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Oct 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's activities program was not run by a qualified professional. The person directing recreation and social activities must have proper training or credentials.
Oct 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience.
Oct 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Apr 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Nov 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Nov 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment.
Nov 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Nov 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Nov 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Nov 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
Nov 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Nov 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Nov 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Nov 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Nov 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Nov 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Nov 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Nov 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Nov 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Nov 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Nov 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Oct 25, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. · from a complaint
Sep 3, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Sep 3, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them.
Sep 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status.
Aug 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (13 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023230E
2024140F
202560F
202630F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityCalifornia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.294.313.95top 39% in California; top 29% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.400.610.69bottom 32% in California; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.583.903.50bottom 37% in California; top 38% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.400.510.48top 44% in California; top 48% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)46.536.745.8bottom 21% in California; bottom 46% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)57.138.142.9bottom 18% in California; bottom 26% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.40, RN 0.50, weekend 4.52. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Nahs Holding INCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest100%06/30/2018
Baja, RalphIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2023
Barlow, JamesIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/29/2018
Edward BegleyOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Ellis-Sherinian, JamesIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2020
Ellis-Sherinian, JamesIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2020
Johnson, MarcIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/20/2022
Johnson, MarcIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/20/2022
Lundquist, VictorIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/21/2018
Moore, MichaelIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2022
Moore, MichaelIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2022
Paulsen, TimothyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/29/2018
Tran, Hong-PhucIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/30/2023
Tran, Hong-PhucIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/29/2026
Walton, MarkIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/29/2018
Walton, MarkIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/29/2018
Weaver, DavidIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE03/31/2023
Weaver, DavidIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/31/2023
Weaver, DavidIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/31/2023
Weaver, DavidIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/31/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Westwood Post Acute Care0.6 miLos Angeles, CA★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Berkley East Healthcare Center0.8 miSanta Monica, CA★★☆☆☆1/5
Santa Monica Health Care Center0.8 miSanta Monica, CA★★★☆☆3/5
Santa Monica Rehabilitation Center0.9 miSanta Monica, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Berkley West Healthcare Center1.0 miSanta Monica, CA★★★☆☆2/5
Pacific Post Acute1.0 miSanta Monica, CA★★★★★4/5
Ocean Pointe Healthcare Center1.0 miSanta Monica, CA★★☆☆☆2/5
Ocean Park Healthcare1.1 miSanta Monica, CA★★☆☆☆2/5
Sunset Park Healthcare1.2 miSanta Monica, CA★★☆☆☆2/5
New Vista Post-Acute Care Center1.3 miLos Angeles, CA★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Beachwood Post-Acute & Rehab1.5 miSanta Monica, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Good Shepherd Health Care Center of Santa Monica1.6 miSanta Monica, CA★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Santa Monica →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 055711.