Benedictine Living Community of St. Peter
1907 Klein Street, St Peter, MN 56082 · Nicollet County · 79 certified beds · avg 70 residents/day · certified since Nov 1, 1987
Part of chain: BENEDICTINE HEALTH SYSTEM (23 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
All citations in the current public record (18)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2026 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. |
| Jan 13, 2026 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Jan 13, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. |
| Jan 13, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Jan 13, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Jan 13, 2026 | C · Minimal risk, facility-wide | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. |
| Oct 30, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. |
| Oct 30, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. |
| Oct 30, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids. |
| Oct 30, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · from a complaint |
| Oct 30, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. |
| Oct 30, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Feb 7, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint |
| Feb 7, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint |
| Dec 20, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not serve meals and snacks at times that fit residents' needs, preferences, and requests, or did not offer nourishing alternatives for residents who want to eat outside scheduled meal times. |
| Dec 20, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Dec 20, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. |
| Dec 20, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 6).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 4 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 8 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 6 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Minnesota avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.47 | 4.83 | 3.95 | bottom 36% in Minnesota; top 24% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.96 | 1.22 | 0.69 | bottom 30% in Minnesota; top 17% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.96 | 4.27 | 3.50 | bottom 37% in Minnesota; top 24% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.56 | 0.69 | 0.48 | bottom 45% in Minnesota; top 27% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 42.9 | 42.2 | 45.8 | bottom 43% in Minnesota; top 44% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 23.1 | 38.6 | 42.9 | top 25% in Minnesota; top 18% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.05, RN 0.87, weekend 3.58. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Who owns this facility
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benedictine Health System | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2004 |
| Bergien, Tricia | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/16/2016 |
| Bray, Alan | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/16/2017 |
| Bruhn, Jennifer | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/13/2020 |
| Carley, Gerald | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/03/2018 |
| Hildebrandt, Teresa | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/11/2016 |
| Holland, Kristen | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/14/2019 |
| Minter, Douglas | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/17/2017 |
| Rundell, Marilyn | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/15/2018 |
| Rymanowski, Kevin | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2008 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Walk me through what happens when a resident or family files a grievance — who responds and how fast?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "What percentage of your residents are on antipsychotic or sedating medications, and how do you work to reduce that?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "Where do you post your daily staffing numbers, and can I see today's?"
- "How often is each resident's medication list reviewed, and who decides when a drug can be reduced or stopped?"
- "If my family member is able to manage their own medications, would you allow it, and how is that decided?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cura of Le Sueur | 7.7 mi | Le Sueur, MN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Central Health Care Center | 12.6 mi | Le Center, MN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Oaklawn Health Care, LLC | 13.1 mi | Mankato, MN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Pathstone Living | 13.3 mi | Mankato, MN | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Hillcrest Health Care, LLC | 14.2 mi | Mankato, MN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Laurels Peak Health Care, LLC | 14.4 mi | Mankato, MN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Bayside Manor LLC | 18.7 mi | Gaylord, MN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245501.